Kooperation bei Großschadensereignissen

Lasogga, F.; Ameln, Falko von

doi:10.1007/s11612-010-0109-4

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The created organizational chart shows how many different organizations would be involved in an MCI-ID in the Port of Hamburg and concurrently re ects the complexity. It can be assumed that if more parties are involved in such a situation, they will have more challenges on the communicational and operational level (47). Cooperation between different organizations in an emergency situation can only be e cient if existing concepts are brought together, coordinated, and most importantly tested regularly.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A mass casualty incident of infectious diseases at the port of Hamburg: an analysis of organizational structures and emergency concepts

Klein

Heuser

Henning

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND The project “ARMIHN” (Adaptive Resiliency Management in Port) focuses on strengthening the capability to act in a mass casualty incident (MCI) due to an outbreak of infectious diseases (MCI-ID). In addition to the current threat from the COVID-19 pandemic and associated outbreaks on cruise ships, an MCI-ID can also be caused by pathogens such as Influenzavirus or Norovirus. The first step was, to get an overview of processes and resources using the example of the Port of Hamburg, and to show the relating interaction of involved parties. This will serve as a basis for developing an operational strategy and offers the opportunity to optimize current work processes. METHODS A selective literature research using specified key words was performed and existing MCI concepts were received from local authorities. Identified structures and processes were analyzed in a multiple step process and also brought together through discussions in workshops with involved organizations and other experts. Additionally, the distances between the nearest rescue stations and selected hospitals from the Port of Hamburg were analyzed. RESULTS The current available concepts are proven, but an adaptation to an MCI-ID shows opportunities for a further cross-organizational development. The organizational structure of an MCI-ID in the Port of Hamburg was described, including a large number of involved organizations (n = 18). There are 17 involved fire and rescue stations and the port can be reached from these locations within 6 to 35 minutes. Based on their specialist expertise, 14 of the 31 listed clinics were selected. CONCLUSION Based on identified existing structures and the determination of medical resources, an operational concept for an MCI-ID in the port can be adapted and can contribute to enhanced coping with this situation. Subsequently, the derived operational concept will be tested for practical suitability in several exercises within the present project.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A mass casualty incident of infectious diseases at the port of Hamburg: an analysis of organizational structures and emergency concepts

Klein

Heuser

Henning

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…preparation, mitigation, response and recovery phases (e.g. Beck and Plowman, 2014; Berchtold et al , 2020; Boin and Bynander, 2015; Bunker et al , 2015; Comfort and Kapucu, 2006; Künzer et al , 2012; Lasogga and von Ameln, 2010; Wolbers et al , 2018; Zareii et al , 2014). A number of these studies from psychology, social sciences, engineering, etc.…”

Section: Interorganisational Collaboration On Event Security: a Theor...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Literature on knowledge: Bechky and Okhuysen (2011), Berchtold et al (2020), Boin and Bynander (2015), Boin et al (2013), BBK (2016), Bunker et al (2015), Comfort (2007), Hackstein et al (2016), Hofinger (2009), Koski et al (2020), K€ unzer et al (2012), Majchrzak et al (2007), Yeo (2020), Waring et al (2018), Wolbers and Boersma (2013), Yeo (2020), Zinke et al (2010) 8. Literature on social aspects: Bechky and Okhuysen (2011),Beck and Plowman (2014),Berchtold et al (2020),Boin and Bynander (2015), BBK (2016),Comfort and Kapucu (2006),Gimenez et al (2017),Hackstein et al (2016),Hofinger (2009),Hofinger and Beck (2017), K€ unzer et al (2012),Lasogga and von Ameln (2010),Majchrzak et al (2007),Scanlon (1999),Tubin and Levin-Rozalis (2008),Uhr et al (2008),Vlaar et al (2006),Waring et al (2018),Yeo (2020),Zareii et al (2014) 9. Literature on technology:Berchtold et al (2020),Bunker et al (2015), BBK (2016),Comfort and Kapucu (2006), Department of Homeland Security (n.d.),K€ unzer et al (2012),Ley et al (2014), Reuter (2015,Rusch (2019)…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Production of event security in Germany – empirical findings on perceptions of interorganisational collaboration between various security actors

Schütte

Willmes²

2022

IJEFM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis paper aims to explore interorganisational collaboration on event security in Germany. Therefore, it focusses on perceptions of representatives from emergency and law enforcement agencies (ELEAs) as well as commercial event stewards and security providers (ESSPs) who work together in the area. The following questions are addressed in this paper: how do the actors perceive inter-organisational collaboration on event security? In these actors' view, what factors define collaboration?Design/methodology/approachFor this study, a literature review was carried out on success-critical factors of inter-organisational collaboration at security-related settings. The results have been grouped into categories, which are assigned to sociotechnical core elements. These are the basis of a qualitative content analysis of 47 semi-structured interviews with ELEA and ESSP representatives in the context of 15 major events in Germany.FindingsThe findings support the assumption that interorganisational collaboration on event security theoretically and in the perception of on-site experts emerges as a sociotechnical system within the setting of major events. Successful collaboration is determined by human, technical and organisational factors, which interconnect the collaborating actors and ideally stabilise their work relations.Originality/valueThis article contributes to the literature regarding event and security research. The results provide insights into hitherto under-represented perspectives of stakeholders on collaboration in event security. The sociotechnical category system adds an approach for the systematic analysis of interorganisational security production.

show abstract

“…b) We concentrated our research specifically on processes intersecting with processes of other organizations to unveil communication needs concerning use of the same resources (machines, places), mutual help, and the like. We focussed on these intersections, since they bear the most critical problems [31][32][33]. Thus, planners have to read and understand plans from other organisations, but ambulances, fire departments, and police forces use different terminologies, with -worse-also false friends.…”

Section: Planning Philosophy: A)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Business Processes and Standard Operating Procedures: Two Coins with Similar Sides

Peinel

Rose

2013

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Concepts and tools for process management have often been transferred to emergency management projects. The driving objective has been to bring assistance to planning procedures and quality assurance. This seems rather natural, since idea and concept of business processes and standard operating procedures appear like siblings. In this paper we discuss whether the concepts of process modelling are adequate for managing standard operating procedures and whether emergency management organisations can capitalize on off-the-shelf business process modelling tools to prepare for disasters more effectively. This paper presents ample evidence that prevailing business process means are inappropriate for emergency management in light of organisational as well as technology issues. In a nutshell, business process concepts are utilized as a "golden hammer" in many emergency management projects, a suitable tool for all purposes. Yet, the question rises whether emergency management issues are always fitting nails.

show abstract

Kooperation bei Großschadensereignissen

Cited by 8 publications

References 5 publications

A mass casualty incident of infectious diseases at the port of Hamburg: an analysis of organizational structures and emergency concepts

A mass casualty incident of infectious diseases at the port of Hamburg: an analysis of organizational structures and emergency concepts

Production of event security in Germany – empirical findings on perceptions of interorganisational collaboration between various security actors

Business Processes and Standard Operating Procedures: Two Coins with Similar Sides

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About