2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00106-020-00823-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kontinuierliches intraoperatives Neuromonitoring (cIONM) in der Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie – eine Übersicht

Abstract: Kontinuierliches intraoperatives Neuromonitoring (cIONM) in der Kopf-Hals-Chirurgie-eine Übersicht Intraoperatives Neuromonitoring (IONM) zielt darauf ab, gefährdete neuronale Strukturen anatomisch und funktionell zu erhalten und so postoperativ temporäre und dauerhafte Paresen zu vermeiden. Modernes IONM ermöglicht nicht nur Nervenidentifizierung, sondern auch die Erkennung potenziell schädlicher Manipulationen; so kann anhand der intraoperativen Informationen eine Vorhersage der postoperativen Funktion erfol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although an elevated nerve response (0.5 mA) could predict postoperative facial nerve paresis at the end of procedure, an absence of an electrically evoked response does not exclude the facial nerve injury (15,17). The incidence of temporary postoperative facial weakness in our cohort is much lower than that in the recent meta-analysis (1.7% vs. 23.4%, adjusted OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.23, P = 0.0001) (16). Possible explanations are that most data in that meta-analysis were based on studies with 2-channel systems during parotidectomy, while we used passive 4 channel-monitoring (electrode placement in the frontal, orbicularis oculi and oris, and mentalis muscles).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although an elevated nerve response (0.5 mA) could predict postoperative facial nerve paresis at the end of procedure, an absence of an electrically evoked response does not exclude the facial nerve injury (15,17). The incidence of temporary postoperative facial weakness in our cohort is much lower than that in the recent meta-analysis (1.7% vs. 23.4%, adjusted OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.23, P = 0.0001) (16). Possible explanations are that most data in that meta-analysis were based on studies with 2-channel systems during parotidectomy, while we used passive 4 channel-monitoring (electrode placement in the frontal, orbicularis oculi and oris, and mentalis muscles).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Dissection, transaction, laceration, clamp compression, retraction, electrocautery, ligature entrapment, suction trauma, or even compressive ischemia can cause iatrogenic facial nerve injury ( 17 ). cIONM during parotid surgery allows early nerve identification, forewarns surgeons of unexpected facial nerve stimulation, maps the nerve course, reduces mechanical nerve damage, and helps to evaluate and prognosticate the nerve function at the end of the procedure ( 15 , 16 ). This real-time monitoring of the facial nerve undoubtedly decreases operation time and increases patient satisfaction ( 17 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation