2020
DOI: 10.1057/s41289-020-00111-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kong at the Gates: guerrilla urbanism and the possibility of resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet in terms of the question raised in the literature about the potential for the informal and erratic nature of temporary urbanism to contribute to destabilizing the structure of and relationships in official public space and create the possibility for new interactions, meanings, and functions (Douglas 2020;Hou 2010), only quite limited progress in this direction may have been made by the Swing Park. And to the extent that this kind of change will occur only if guerrilla urbanists can find ways to connect with each other across the wide variety of temporary urbanism efforts via networking so that multiple individual efforts add up to bigger change (Holloway 2010;Iveson 2013), certainly Hayes and beintween continued to undertake temporary urbanism efforts that included collaboration, such as with community groups, the City of Milwaukee, and NEWaukee on the ARTery using Kickstarter funds.…”
Section: Urban Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet in terms of the question raised in the literature about the potential for the informal and erratic nature of temporary urbanism to contribute to destabilizing the structure of and relationships in official public space and create the possibility for new interactions, meanings, and functions (Douglas 2020;Hou 2010), only quite limited progress in this direction may have been made by the Swing Park. And to the extent that this kind of change will occur only if guerrilla urbanists can find ways to connect with each other across the wide variety of temporary urbanism efforts via networking so that multiple individual efforts add up to bigger change (Holloway 2010;Iveson 2013), certainly Hayes and beintween continued to undertake temporary urbanism efforts that included collaboration, such as with community groups, the City of Milwaukee, and NEWaukee on the ARTery using Kickstarter funds.…”
Section: Urban Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of tactical urbanism -bringing about long-term changes through the verification of short-term effects -has recently been on the rise overseas (Silva, 2016;Haydn & Temel, 2006;McGuire, 2017;Webb, 2018). A growing uncertainty about the success of long-term urban planning, combined with the failure of existing urban regeneration schemes, has played a part in increasing urban regeneration projects using tactical urbanism Mould, 2014;Douglas, 2020). Tactical urbanism constitutes an approach employed to achieve goals by compensating for existing urban planning schemes' limitations and responding to pending urban regeneration issues in a flexible manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%