Konfliktregulierung bei Straftaten — Variation des Anzeigeverhaltens nach der Ethnie der Täter

Mansel, Jürgen

doi:10.1007/978-3-322-99668-8_11

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As predicted, right-wing political attitude, criminal history, and repetition of leaking increased the seriousness ratings and the likelihood to report leaking among laypersons. Information about the potential perpetrator's Arab ethnicity did not influence the seriousness assessment, but did influence the likelihood of reporting, supporting research suggesting a higher likelihood to report suspects with a migration background than native suspects (Carson and Politte, 2021;Mansel and Albrecht, 2003). Contrary to our expectations, higher age of the potential perpetrator increased laypersons' likelihood to report leaking.…”

Section: The Influence Of Information About the Potential Perpetratorcontrasting

confidence: 43%

“…For example, the Prevent Duty in UK was often associated with Islamist, but not with right-wing radicalization (Busher et al, 2017). Consequently, one study found individuals with a migration background to be more likely to be reported to the police than native perpetrators (Mansel and Albrecht, 2003). The recently increasing number of terrorist offenses by perpetrators with far-right motives, however, may have complemented this stereotype and let to a shift in reporting behavior (Williamson and Murphy, 2020).…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Potential Perpetratormentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Assessing and reporting leaking of violent intent: Influences of perpetrator and witness characteristics

Tampe

Bondü

2022

European Journal of Criminology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Because the police are reliant on laypersons to report announcements (leaking) of terrorist attacks, it is crucial to examine potential determinants for their assessment of the seriousness of leaking and the likelihood to report it. Members of the law enforcement authorities also need to decide which instances of leaking to prosecute further. We asked 392 laypersons and 188 police students to assess the seriousness and anticipated likelihood to report/prosecute leaking. Using a behavioral process tracing (BPT) task, we examined which further information they consider important for their decisions. We also assessed participant characteristics that may influence these decisions. Laypersons rated the seriousness of leaking higher than police students, but were less likely to report it to the police than police students were likely to have the leaking prosecuted. Both groups selected information about the potential perpetrator's criminal history, political attitude, and repetition of leaking most frequently. Accordingly, receiving information about the potential perpetrator's criminal past, right-wing attitude, and repetition of leaking in the BPT task was associated with increases in the seriousness ratings and the likelihood to report/prosecute leaking in both groups. Concerning the participants’ characteristics, particularly fear of terrorism (and partly political attitude and news consumption) predicted both the seriousness ratings and the likelihood to report/prosecute leaking. In conclusion, characteristics of both the potential perpetrator and the participants drove the decisions. Thus, it seems important to provide more information about the concept of leaking and to emphasize its importance in preventing terrorist attacks in order to improve the likelihood to report/prosecute it. Additionally, the development of objective assessment criteria for the police seems essential in order to reduce the influence of witnesses' characteristics on these decisions.

show abstract

Section: The Influence Of Information About the Potential Perpetratorcontrasting

confidence: 43%

Section: Characteristics Of the Potential Perpetratormentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing and reporting leaking of violent intent: Influences of perpetrator and witness characteristics

Tampe

Bondü

2022

European Journal of Criminology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Ausländer unter Tatverdacht

Mansel

2008

Koelner Z.Soziol.u.Soz.Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

u. a. auch je nach der zugrundegelegten Datenquelle) zum Teil sehr unterschiedlich und werden je nach theoretischer Position auch verschieden interpretiert. Umstritten ist auch der Sachverhalt, weshalb Strafverfahren, in welchen gegen junge nichtdeutsche Tatverdächtige ermittelt wird, häufiger eingestellt werden, als jene gegen Deutsche. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird im vorliegenden Beitrag anhand von Daten, die im Rahmen einer Auswertung von staatsanwaltlichen Ermittlungsakten erhoben wurden (N = 860 Tatverdächtige) geprüft, ob sich die Qualität und die Struktur der Delikte, die Deutschen und Nichtdeutschen zur Last gelegt werden, sowie die Ergebnisse der Ermittlungsarbeit unterscheiden. Im Hinblick auf die Qualität ergeben sich bei den Delikten, die Deutschen und Nichtdeutschen zur Last gelegt werden, nur graduelle Unterschiede. Als relevant für die höhere Einstellungsquote von Ermittlungsverfahren gegen junge Ausländer erweist sich demgegenüber primär die Beweislage. Dies muss jedoch keineswegs als ein Hinweis darauf gedeutet werden, dass es den jungen Nichtdeutschen häufiger gelingt, die Tatumstände erfolgreich zu "verschleiern", sondern kann auch darauf beruhen, dass Nichtdeutsche häufiger fälschlich der Ausführung einer Straftat verdächtigt werden.Stichworte: Nicht-Deutsche · Kriminalität · Tatverdächtige · Staatsanwaltschaft · Verfahrenseinstellung · Abgeurteilte Abstract: Findings on the quantity and quality of criminal behavior of immigrant groups differ very widely (partly depending on the source of data used) and interpretations differ according to theoretical standpoint. There is also controversy over the reasons why charges are more often dropped in cases against young non-Germans than in cases against German citizens. Data from prosecution service records were analysed (N = 860 suspects) to investigate whether differences could be found in the quality and structure of the offenses of which Germans and non-Germans Ausländer unter Tatverdacht

show abstract

Contradictions in German Penal Practices: The Long Goodbye from the Rehabilitation Principle

Dollinger¹,

Kretschmann²

2013

Punishment in Europe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Konfliktregulierung bei Straftaten — Variation des Anzeigeverhaltens nach der Ethnie der Täter

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

Assessing and reporting leaking of violent intent: Influences of perpetrator and witness characteristics

Assessing and reporting leaking of violent intent: Influences of perpetrator and witness characteristics

Ausländer unter Tatverdacht

Contradictions in German Penal Practices: The Long Goodbye from the Rehabilitation Principle

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About