The Kondo effect in superconductors is frequently investigated using the local quasiparticle density of states as sole bath characteristics, i.e., the presence of anomalous propagators is ignored. Here we point out that this treatment is exact for a number of situations, including point-like impurities in dwave superconductors. We comment on recent investigations [M. M. Koga, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 70, 2860 (2001) and Phys. Rev. B 65, 024508 (2002)] which reached different conclusions: while their numerical results are likely correct, their interpretation in terms of two-channel Kondo physics and an "orbital effect of Cooper pairs" is incorrect.PACS numbers: 75.20.Hr, The physics of quantum impurity moments in superconductors, associated with the Kondo effect, has been subject of numerous investigations in recent years. Diverse theoretical techniques have been employed to study Kondo or Anderson models in a superconducting environment [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Most of these studies effectively neglect the presence of superconducting (sc) fluctuations in the host, i.e., they use the local fermionic density of states (DOS) as the only input quantity characterizing the environment of the Kondo impurity. For s-wave superconductors it has been shown [1] that this approximation is not justified: here the properties of a Kondo impurity are different from the ones of an impurity embedded in a non-superconducting system with the same DOS. More precisely, the superconducting bath turns out to be equivalent to a non-superconducting bath with additional particle-hole (p-h) asymmetry [1]. As a result, for a p-h symmetric conduction band a screened singlet state is realized at large Kondo coupling, in contrast to the non-sc case with a hard gap in the local DOS [11]. This difference can be understood as caused by the anomalous bath propagators.In this Brief Report, we address the role of anomalous propagators in unconventional superconductors. We argue below that neglecting sc propagators is exact in many, potentially experimentally relevant, cases, e.g., for point-like impurities in d-wave and unitary p-wave superconductors. In these situations, the dynamics of the impurity degrees of freedom can be calculated using the normal bath propagators only. We also comment on recent papers by Matsumoto and Koga who argued in favor of a non-trivial "orbital effect of Cooper pairs" for pointlike impurities in both p + ip and d + id superconductors [7,8]. While we believe that their numerical results are correct, we point out that such an orbital effect does not exist: in their situation the impurity properties are exclusively determined by the local DOS.We start from the action of an Anderson impurity in a general interacting host.where β = 1/T is the inverse temperature, c are the conduction electrons with dispersion ǫ k on a regular lattice with N sites, S int are the interactions within the conduction band, and S loc describes the f electron impurity orbital with on-site energy and repulsion. The sum {i} runs over a set of lattic...