2020
DOI: 10.20527/jukung.v6i2.9259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Komparasi Model Cellular Automata Dalam Memprediksi Perubahan Lahan Sawah Di Kabupaten Purworejo

Abstract: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkomparasikan akurasi metode ANN dan LR dalam memprediksi perubahan lahan sawah di Kabupaten Purworejo. Adapun data masukan yang dibutuhkan adalah peta lahan sawah tahun 2008, 2015 dan 2019 hasil interpretasi visual citra satelit resolusi tinggi dan faktor pendorong perubahan lahan sawah. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model prediksi lahan sawah yang dibangun dari ANN dan LR secara umum memiliki akurasi yang sama-sama baik. Tetapi jika dilihat dari total nilai false alarm … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The driving factor is an independent variable in building a transition probability model, in previous studies the driving factors used are existing factors that will cause changes in land cover, in this case the distance factor of existing land to the surrounding land use [3]. Distance an influential factor in spatial dynamics, including changes in land cover.…”
Section: Factors Driving Land Cover Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The driving factor is an independent variable in building a transition probability model, in previous studies the driving factors used are existing factors that will cause changes in land cover, in this case the distance factor of existing land to the surrounding land use [3]. Distance an influential factor in spatial dynamics, including changes in land cover.…”
Section: Factors Driving Land Cover Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent variables that have a high correlation value are assumed to have the same characteristics, so they can give rise to multicollinearity that can interfere with the regression process [7]. There is a factor that has a high correlation value or is above 0.7 then one of the factors can be eliminated to prevent multicollinearity [3]. The results of the calculation of Evaluating correlation can be seen in table 2.…”
Section: Evaluating Pearson's Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual classification has better accuracy for classifying land cover than digital classification (Kosasih et al 2019). This is because visual interpretation can distinguish between objects in an image based on human judgment, which can lead to better interpretation of complex objects, but visual interpretation is not efficient in terms of processing time (Fariz et al 2020).…”
Section: Land Use/ Land Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Land cover data for 2019 was obtained from the visual interpretation of Landsat-8 satellite imagery. The mapping process is carried out by updating the 2009 land cover map based on the appearance of satellite imagery in 2019 (Fariz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Land Cover Change Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this research needs to be developed based on the limitations that we have conveyed. In addition, land change studies should also be analyzed projectionally using Cellular Automata analysis, such as research by Nurhidayati et al (2017), Fariz et al (2020) and Permatasari et al (2021), so that land cover changes can be seen spatially.…”
Section: The Interests Of Settlements In the District Of Sepakumentioning
confidence: 99%