Komparasi Metode Simple Addtive Weighting dan Weight Product Menggunakan Sistem Pendukung Keputusan pada Penerimaan BLT

Abstract

Direct cash assistance is a program of local government efforts to deal with problems that occur in underprivileged families. This program is sought so that the community has less impact on economic growth and welfare. The methode used this system is.the.Simple Addtive Weighting (SAW) and Weight Product (WP) methods. Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) is a decision making process which in the process adds up the weights of the performance appraisal on all alternative attributes. While the Weight Product (WP) method is an analyst decision.methode for a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) or multi - criteria decision making (MCDM). The existence of a comparison between the two methods is expected to help better select residents in receiving BLT so that they are more targeted. In this study resulted in a system to determine the citizens who are entitled to receive BLT, based on the result the study. Comparison of the SAW and WP methods using 20 alternative data, shows that the second method gets accurate data and is suitable if applied as a ranking of citizens in BLT receipts. In the ranking occupied by Burhan by getting the highest score on the 2 methods, there is an equal ranking of the 2 methods caused by the alternative performance scores, and the weight value of the first criterion in each method. Results Based on the research, is it recommended to use the SAW method to determine the ranking, cause the Ievel of suitability of.the.data in the field is higher than the WP found 99.40 WP found 99.20%.

Analisis Perbandingan Metode ROC-WASPAS dan Entropy-WASPAS dalam Keputusan Pemberian Reward Kinerja Pegawai Hotel

“…Metode ini merupakan untuk mengurangi kesalahan-kesalahan dalam penaksiran untuk nilai tertinggi dan terendah, dapat dilihat sebagai berikut [20], [21], [30], [31], [22]…”

Implementation of Simple Additive Weighting to Decide a Fund Proposal

“…The sensitivity test selects the method that has a greater sensitive value so that the SAW method is selected as the relevant method. Other research on the comparison between SAW and WP in the decision support system for receiving direct cash assistance government programs showed that SAW is more recommended because the level of conformity between system calculations and manual calculations shows 0% error, whereas in WP there was a slight difference between the results of system calculations and manual calculations [6]. SAW was implemented in research on the creditworthiness of loans at BMT [8] with the criteria of photocopies of Family Cards, Resident Identity Cards, electricity bills, Land and Building Tax, and guaranteed land/building certificates.…”