Kommunikativ planlegging og demokrati

Pløger, John

doi:10.7577/nibr/rapport/2002/17

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Arkitektur og rum koder så at sige det sociale felt, så det får en specifik betydning for sociale forbindelser, og rummet foreskriver en form for moral, der laegger det anstaendige og forudsigelige hverdagsliv til rette. 32 34 En idraetspolitisk (by)planlaegning må i dette perspektiv også opfattes som en plan for idraetslivet og dermed som styring og orkestrering af livet som sådant. Om der planlaegges idraetsfaciliteter taet på arbejdspladsen eller boligen, i midtbyen eller midt på en åben mark har store konsekvenser for det levede liv, samtidig med at karakteren af de planlagte idraetsfaciliteter har det.…”

Section: Byplanlaegningens Logik -Et Spørgsmål Om Faellesskabunclassified

“…de arkitektoniske former ud fra en idé om, at formen er anvisende for normen. 35 Men hvad er det så for en dominerende normalitet, der er herskende på byplanlaegningens felt?…”

Section: Byplanlaegningens Logik -Et Spørgsmål Om Faellesskabunclassified

“…Bauman kan dog godt vaere bekymret for tabet af det store faellesskab, men ser ingen mulighed for at restaurere det i en verden af fremmede. 38 Forfølges Baumans tankegang og med ham John Pløgers, har kommunitarismen så at sige udspillet sig selv som effektiv overordnet politisk ideologi bag byplanlaegningen. Der er således gennem den (post)moderne byudvikling opstået et antagonistisk forhold mellem en politisk, ideologisk vilje til faellesskab og en øget observerbar tendens til individualisering og forskellighed, eller i hvert fald andre former for socialt faellesskab end den, kommunitarismen tilstraeber.…”

Section: En Kommunitaristisk Doxataenkningunclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Idræt og byplanlægning - med København som case

Eskelund¹

2004

dif

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sport and urban planning – with Copenhagen as case study This article deals with the field of sport and urban planning in large cities, with special focus on the municipality of Copenhagen from 1988-2003. In the first place a situation marked by decline is shown to have existed in the field of sport in Copenhagen over recent years (especially in the central section of the city). This provides the opportunity to pose the question of primary concern: How can sport, city life and urban planning be conceived in relation to future guidelines on the politics of sport and on urban planning in a large city such as Copenhagen? The task here is to recommend a way out of decline through an analysis of the area of “sport and urban planning”. Looked at more specifically, in an attempt to break with possibly restrictive thinking patterns, questions have to asked as to the reasoning behind existing politics on this area. What forms of authoritative and legitimate rationalization (and what conditions of power) have been dominating the politics of sport in Copenhagen from 1988- 2003? And how should future guidelines be formulated in order to make sport a more integral part of the city? On this matter a hypothesis is put forward here that sport in a municipal context is subject to a dominant planning norm, which is devoted to an idea of “obligational fellowship”, and that this norm can be restrictive in regard to new thinking on how to make sport a more integral part of the city.

show abstract

Section: Byplanlaegningens Logik -Et Spørgsmål Om Faellesskabunclassified

“…de arkitektoniske former ud fra en idé om, at formen er anvisende for normen. 35 Men hvad er det så for en dominerende normalitet, der er herskende på byplanlaegningens felt?…”

Section: Byplanlaegningens Logik -Et Spørgsmål Om Faellesskabunclassified

Section: En Kommunitaristisk Doxataenkningunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Idræt og byplanlægning - med København som case

Eskelund¹

2004

dif

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Ethics in Norwegian planning: legitimacy, ambivalence, rhetoric

Pløger

2004

Planning Practice and Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Strife: Urban Planning and Agonism

Pløger¹

2004

Planning Theory

241

179

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conflict is immanent to planning, and perhaps particularly to practice within a pluralistic, multicultural society. Chantal Mouffe argues that there is a political need for an ‘agonistic pluralism’ as a democratic response to a context of diversity and conflict. Perhaps the key complex of problems in contemporary planning is how to work with ‘strife’. Proceeding from the perspective of a Danish urban regeneration project named ‘kvarterløft’, this article will discuss planning experiences with conflicts, empowerment, consensussteering, and governance that point to the need to make ‘strife’ – the ongoing dispute about words, meaning, discourses, visions or ‘the good life’ – central to planning processes.

show abstract

Kommunikativ planlegging og demokrati

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Idræt og byplanlægning - med København som case

Idræt og byplanlægning - med København som case

Ethics in Norwegian planning: legitimacy, ambivalence, rhetoric

Strife: Urban Planning and Agonism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About