Kommunikation im Team und Burnout

Schwarzkopf, Daniel; Meißner, Winfried; Wedding, Ulrich; Riedemann, Niels C.; Pfeifer, Rüdiger; Fritzenwanger, Michael; Günther, A.; Egerland, K.; Henkel, Max; Skupin, Helga; Muecke, Marcus Maximilian; Hartog, Christiane S.

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1327221

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Accordingly, two survey studies of hospice teams in the United States found no differences between the professions (e.g., nurses, physicians, social workers, and chaplains) in their ratings of the quality of interdisciplinary collaboration [ 13 , 15 ]. Except for small single-center studies, little is known about interprofessional/interdisciplinary collaboration in inpatient palliative care units (PCUs) [ 16 , 17 ]. We conducted a single-center study comparing experiences in the context of end-of-life decision-making experiences between ICU and PCU staff and found that PCU staff gave better ratings of the interaction within the team, and while ICU nurses rated interaction poorer than ICU physicians, ratings of PCU nurses and PCU physicians did not differ [ 16 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Except for small single-center studies, little is known about interprofessional/interdisciplinary collaboration in inpatient palliative care units (PCUs) [ 16 , 17 ]. We conducted a single-center study comparing experiences in the context of end-of-life decision-making experiences between ICU and PCU staff and found that PCU staff gave better ratings of the interaction within the team, and while ICU nurses rated interaction poorer than ICU physicians, ratings of PCU nurses and PCU physicians did not differ [ 16 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Perceptions of Quality of Interprofessional Collaboration, Staff Well-Being and Nonbeneficial Treatment: A Comparison between Nurses and Physicians in Intensive and Palliative Care

Schwarzkopf,

Bloos,

Meißner

et al. 2024

Healthcare

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study assessed differences in interprofessional collaboration, perception of nonbeneficial care, and staff well-being between critical care and palliative care teams. In six German hospitals, a staff survey was conducted between December 2013 and March 2015 among nurses and physicians in intensive and palliative care units. To allow comparability between unit types, a matching was performed for demographic characteristics of staff. N = 313 critical care and 79 palliative care staff participated, of which 72 each were successfully matched. Critical care nurses perceived the poorest overall quality of collaboration compared with critical care physicians and palliative care physicians and nurses. They also reported less inclusive leadership from attendings and head nurses, and the least collaboration on care decisions with physicians. They were most likely to perceive nonbeneficial care, and they reported the lowest levels of job satisfaction and the highest intention to leave the job. In partial correlations, aspects of high-quality collaboration were associated with less perceived nonbeneficial care and higher staff well-being for both critical care and palliative care staff. Our findings indicate that critical care teams could improve collaboration and enhance well-being, particularly among nurses, by adopting principles of collaborative work culture as established in palliative care.

show abstract