2017
DOI: 10.1090/surv/220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kolmogorov Complexity and Algorithmic Randomness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
120
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One area where both p-values and e-values have been used for a long time is the algorithmic theory of randomness (see, e.g., Shen et al (2017)), which originated in Kolmogorov's work on the algorithmic foundations of probability and information (Kolmogorov, 1965(Kolmogorov, , 1968. Martin-Löf (1966) introduced an algorithmic version of p-values, and then Levin (1976) introduced an algorithmic version of e-values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One area where both p-values and e-values have been used for a long time is the algorithmic theory of randomness (see, e.g., Shen et al (2017)), which originated in Kolmogorov's work on the algorithmic foundations of probability and information (Kolmogorov, 1965(Kolmogorov, , 1968. Martin-Löf (1966) introduced an algorithmic version of p-values, and then Levin (1976) introduced an algorithmic version of e-values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, we define algorithmic randomness in CTMCs using the martingale (betting strategy) approach of Schnorr [18]. This approach extends to other levels of randomness in a straightforward manner, while our present state (i.e., lack) of knowledge in computational complexity theory does not allow us to extend other approaches (e.g., Martin-Löf tests or Kolmogorov complexity, which are known to be equivalent to the martingale approach at the algorithmic level [13,4,17,22]) to time-bounded complexity classes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…where U is a fixed universal prefix Turing machine, and π is the length of a binary "program π for x." Extensive discussions of the history and intuition behind this notion, including its essential invariance with respect to the choice of the universal Turing machine U , may be found in any of the standard texts [23,11,40,41]. By routine encoding we extend this notion to let x range over various countable sets, so that K(x) is well defined when x is an element of N, Q, Q n , etc.…”
Section: Algorithmic Information and Algorithmic Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%