1997
DOI: 10.1080/09668139708412452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Kolkhozy, the Russian achilles heel: Failed Agrarian reform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, such a society may appear during war or at a crisis stage, as was the case of the kibbutzim in Israel [23,24] and the revolutionary base areas in the early stage of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) [25,26]. Third, such a society may appear in the era of a faded market under the public ownership economy, which for example happened with the kolkhozy (collective farms) in the Soviet Union during the collectivization of the country's agricultural sector [27]. Fourth, such a society may appear in an era of market failure, such as the corporate communities built by high-tech companies in California to bail their employees out of the soaring real estate prices in recent years.…”
Section: Corporate-run Society: the Institutional Logic Of Collectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, such a society may appear during war or at a crisis stage, as was the case of the kibbutzim in Israel [23,24] and the revolutionary base areas in the early stage of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) [25,26]. Third, such a society may appear in the era of a faded market under the public ownership economy, which for example happened with the kolkhozy (collective farms) in the Soviet Union during the collectivization of the country's agricultural sector [27]. Fourth, such a society may appear in an era of market failure, such as the corporate communities built by high-tech companies in California to bail their employees out of the soaring real estate prices in recent years.…”
Section: Corporate-run Society: the Institutional Logic Of Collectivementioning
confidence: 99%