2009
DOI: 10.1086/596104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Koh-i-Noor: Empire, Diamonds, and the Performance of British Material Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The former was the poster-child for the industrial age and the fuel that powered the future on display at the Exhibition. In contrast, as both contemporary observers and several later 1851: REMATERIALISING THE GREAT EXHIBITION scholars have remarked (particularly Kinsey 2009 andYoung 2007), the diamond came to be seen as premodern and 'primitive', foreign and even 'feminine': an undesirable and anachronistic substance when compared to the wonder stuff that was British coal. Reconsidering how such substances and objects came to be in the Palace, Louise Purbrick argues 'is to dislodge [them] from its taxonomies and hierarchies of temporary, stationary display' and to rematerialise them as 'matter for world history ' (2016, paras.…”
Section: Among the Exhibitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The former was the poster-child for the industrial age and the fuel that powered the future on display at the Exhibition. In contrast, as both contemporary observers and several later 1851: REMATERIALISING THE GREAT EXHIBITION scholars have remarked (particularly Kinsey 2009 andYoung 2007), the diamond came to be seen as premodern and 'primitive', foreign and even 'feminine': an undesirable and anachronistic substance when compared to the wonder stuff that was British coal. Reconsidering how such substances and objects came to be in the Palace, Louise Purbrick argues 'is to dislodge [them] from its taxonomies and hierarchies of temporary, stationary display' and to rematerialise them as 'matter for world history ' (2016, paras.…”
Section: Among the Exhibitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this rich body of scholarship, surprisingly few attempts have been made to directly follow the materiality of the Exhibition and its building together (though see Purbrick 2016;Kinsey 2009; with newer scholarship also on the materials of the Sydenham Crystal Palace, e.g. Nichols and Turner 2017).…”
Section: : Rematerialising the Great Exhibitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 In a study of the Koh-i-Noor, the infamous Indian diamond surrendered to Queen Victoria on the 250 th anniversary of the founding of the East India Company, Danielle C. Kinsey states that this particular jewel 'registered … as an emblem of a frivolous, feminized, and orientalized luxury commodity'; the diamond was often considered to epitomise 'old-fashioned plunder imperialism'. 47 'Victorian consumers', Kinsey claims, 'were in many ways hyperaware of where things came from and the networks of exploitation that were in place to deliver these goods'. 48 While the controversy surrounding the Koh-i-Noor was at its peak a few decades prior, 1897, the year of Victoria's Diamond Jubilee (and the publication of Stoker's novel) launched the Crown Jewels back to the forefront of the public consciousness, particularly when Victoria was offered 'the 245-carat Jubilee Diamond from South Africa' to celebrate the sixty years of her reign.…”
Section: Diamond Buckles and Jubileesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Алмазы встречаются также в местах падения метеоритов [2]. На протяжении веков бриллианты считались дорогостоящим материалом для изготовления украшений, а самые редкие образцы служили символом власти и благородства [3]. Ситуация изменилась в ХХ веке, когда были разработаны методы производства синтетических алмазов.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified