Knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals towards patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at a comprehensive cancer center

Abstract

Background Despite evidence of the positive impact of routine assessment of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), their systematic collection is not widely implemented in cancer care. Aim To assess the knowledge, use and attitudes of healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards PROMs and electronically collected PROMs (ePROMs) in clinical practice and research and to explore respondent-related factors associated with the above dimensions. Method An ad hoc developed online survey was administered to all HCPs employed in clinical activity in an Italian comprehensive cancer center. The survey investigated which PROMs were known and used, as well as HCPs’ opinions on the advantages and drawbacks of routine PROM assessment, including electronic assessment (ePROM). Linear and logistic regression models were used for association analyses. Results Five Hundred Eleven of nine hundred ninety-two invited HCPs (52%) provided analyzable responses. 68% were women, 46% were nurses and 42% physicians, and 52.5% had > 20 years seniority. The average number of PROMs known was six among 17 proposed. All proved to be under-used (< 28%) except unidimensional and multidimensional pain scales (77 and 36%). Respondents expressed an overall positive attitude towards PROMs, with strengths outweighing weaknesses (mean overall scores 3.6 and 2.9, respectively, on a 1–5 scale). 67% of respondents preferred electronic collection over paper and pencil. Profession was associated with knowledge and use (physicians reported knowing more PROMs than other professionals) and with a preference for electronic collection (nurses were less likely to prefer the electronic format than physicians). Senior HCPs were slightly more critical about both PROMs and electronic administration. Conclusions This survey indicates an acceptable level of knowledge of common PROM tools but low usage in practice. Based on the generally positive attitude of HCPs, routine implementation of ePROMs can be promoted as long as adequate resources and training are provided. Trial registration Not registered.

A literature review on vaginal dilator use

“…There are nineteen questions for the FSFI, which is seen as a detractor for some patients. 35 The FFSI also has a cut off score of 26.55, suggesting that women who score below this do not have sexual dysfunction. 36 The Short Form of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI-6) [see Appendix IX] is 6 questions long and correlates well with the FSFI.…”

Characterizing Different Multidisciplinary Team Models Implemented Within One Comprehensive Cancer Center

“…34,36 They are rarely applied in MDTWs reflecting what happens in routine clinical oncology practice. 37,38 This could represent another indicator of low patient-centeredness. 32,34 Finally, a high percentage of professionals supported the importance of training in MDTWs and they stressed the importance of improving communication skills and leadership.…”

“… 34 , 36 They are rarely applied in MDTWs reflecting what happens in routine clinical oncology practice. 37 , 38 This could represent another indicator of low patient-centeredness. 32 , 34 …”

Simultaneous care in oncology: Assessment of benefit in relation to symptoms, sex, and age in 753 patients

“…The role of the oncologist remains crucial to identify all patients in need of early palliative care through the systematic use of PROMs, which are now part of clinical practice (60). Assessment of patients' needs should be done across the board on all patients with metastatic cancer, and then, through joint evaluation at SCOC, the categories of patients in greatest need can be identified.…”