Knowledge translation for realist reviews: a participatory approach for a review on scaling up complex interventions

Abstract

BackgroundKnowledge syntheses that use a realist methodology are gaining popularity. Yet, there are few reports in the literature that describe how results are summarised, shared and used. This paper aims to inform knowledge translation (KT) for realist reviews by describing the process of developing a KT strategy for a review on pathways for scaling up complex public health interventions.MethodsThe participatory approach used for the realist review was also used to develop the KT strategy. The approach included three main steps, namely (1) an international meeting focused on interpreting preliminary findings from the realist review and seeking input on KT activities; (2) a targeted literature review on KT for realist reviews; and (3) consultations with primary knowledge users of the review.ResultsThe international meeting identified a general preference among knowledge users for findings from the review that are action oriented. A need was also identified for understanding how to tailor findings for specific knowledge user groups in relation to their needs. The literature review identified four papers that included brief descriptions of planned or actual KT activities for specific research studies; however, information was minimal on what KT activities or products work for whom, under what conditions and why. The consultations revealed that KT for realist reviews should consider the following: (1) activities closely aligned with the preferences of specific knowledge user groups; (2) key findings that are sensitive to factors within the knowledge user’s context; and (3) actionable statements that can advance KT goals, activities or products. The KT strategy derived from the three activities includes a planning framework and tailored KT activities that address preferences of knowledge users for findings that are action oriented and context relevant.ConclusionsThis paper provides an example of a KT strategy for realist reviews that blends theoretical and practical insights. Evaluation of the strategy’s implementation will provide useful insights on its effectiveness and potential for broader application.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0374-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Developing a framework to inform scale-up success for population health interventions: a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature

“…To date, efforts to scale-up population health interventions (PHI) have been met with variable success [1][2][3][4]. To help guide successful scale-up of a PHI, practitioners may draw upon evidence-based and theory-informed frameworks.…”

Flourishing together: research protocol for developing methods to better include disabled people’s knowledge in health policy development

“…To facilitate CPT engagement with the data and sense-making, innovative purpose-built tools will be developed as part of this project. A refined programme theory will then be used to develop kāinga recommendations in Phase 4 [ 84 ].…”

Applying and reporting relevance, richness and rigour in realist evidence appraisals: Advancing key concepts in realist reviews

“…3 This is done by theorising on the underlying mechanisms that may explain why and how change occurs. 1,[4][5][6] These programme theories are developed, refined and tested through data provided by the review's included sources. Realist reviews, like other realist-informed approaches, are ontologically underpinned by tenets of critical realism and scientific realism and are guided by the notions of ontological depth and mechanism-based theorising.…”