2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10758-015-9246-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Structure Measures of Reader’s Situation Models Across Languages: Translation Engenders Richer Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Students who learn English as a foreign language read word by word in their attempt to understand the meaning of text without deciding which words are the most important to help in understanding the whole text (Kim and Clariana, 2015;Kathleen, 2013). In the traditional method of teaching, the teachers train students to employ whatever techniques that may help them to extract general meaning of the text (Kaplan and Norton, 1996 andLawson et al, 1998).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students who learn English as a foreign language read word by word in their attempt to understand the meaning of text without deciding which words are the most important to help in understanding the whole text (Kim and Clariana, 2015;Kathleen, 2013). In the traditional method of teaching, the teachers train students to employ whatever techniques that may help them to extract general meaning of the text (Kaplan and Norton, 1996 andLawson et al, 1998).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GIKS is unique in that it can provide specific feedback in the form of a visual representation of knowledge structure inherent in the text's key concepts (i.e., identified keywords) and their proximity relationships (i.e., distance between keywords). It has user buttons that change the display of the network graph to show errors only, correct associations only, and both; and that provides a list of missing terms and missing links and prompts the student to revise and resubmit their essay (e.g., Clariana, Wolfe, and Kim 2014;Fesel, Segers, Clariana, and Verhoeven 2015;Kim and Clariana 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The text base is a hierarchical system, with propositions of different statuses occupying different levels and having different strengths. It represents the surface-level, literal meaning the text is intended to convey-both a linear sequence of words and a relational set of concepts (Kim & Clariana, 2013). The last level is the situation model, which is the mental representation of the text.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L2 language features that directly impact deeper-level comprehension are culturallyspecific content knowledge and text-organizational conventions (Abu-Rabia, 1996;Carrell, 1984;Kang, 1992;Sharp, 2010). L2 readers do not have the appropriate L2 background knowledge available (Carrell, 1984;Eggington, 1987;Nassaji, 2007), leading to a fragmented, less vivacious, and less finely structured comprehension at a deeper level (Kim & Clariana, 2013;Koda, 2005;Steffensen, Goetz, & Cheng, 1999).…”
Section: Deeper-level Comprehension Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation