2011
DOI: 10.4324/9780203814796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge, Skills and Competence in the European Labour Market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…it draws on research carried out by the authors over the past ten years to compare construction qualifications and VET systems in different European countries, as well as more recent work on LEC. This research includes: a Nuffield Foundation study to compare the qualifications, skills and competences required for bricklaying, nursing, iCT, and lorry-driving in England, France, Germany and the Netherlands, including the ways these were conceived and their corresponding VET systems (Brockmann et al 2011); a study of bricklaying qualifications in eight European countries supported by the EC to examine the ways in which the mutual recognition of qualifications might be achieved (Brockmann et al 2010); and an EC comparative project of upholstery and cabinet making in six countries to propose core qualification profiles (iG Metall Vorstand 2014). Each of these research projects involved extensive interviews with FE Colleges, trade unions, and employers and drew on parallel research, including the SQF-Con project, concerned to develop a sectoral qualifications framework for the construction industry in Europe (Syben 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it draws on research carried out by the authors over the past ten years to compare construction qualifications and VET systems in different European countries, as well as more recent work on LEC. This research includes: a Nuffield Foundation study to compare the qualifications, skills and competences required for bricklaying, nursing, iCT, and lorry-driving in England, France, Germany and the Netherlands, including the ways these were conceived and their corresponding VET systems (Brockmann et al 2011); a study of bricklaying qualifications in eight European countries supported by the EC to examine the ways in which the mutual recognition of qualifications might be achieved (Brockmann et al 2010); and an EC comparative project of upholstery and cabinet making in six countries to propose core qualification profiles (iG Metall Vorstand 2014). Each of these research projects involved extensive interviews with FE Colleges, trade unions, and employers and drew on parallel research, including the SQF-Con project, concerned to develop a sectoral qualifications framework for the construction industry in Europe (Syben 2009).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Germany, 2.5 million students were enrolled across 330 different VET programs from 2013 to 2014 alone (Federal Statistical Office 2014). Recent efforts were initiated to compare and rank the quality of VET programs nationally and internationally, for example, in the National Quality Framework (NQF) and the European Quality Framework (EQF; Brockmann et al 2011;Deissinger 2009). However, comparing international and national VET programs is difficult due to their lack of common standards for learning goals (Brockmann et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent efforts were initiated to compare and rank the quality of VET programs nationally and internationally, for example, in the National Quality Framework (NQF) and the European Quality Framework (EQF; Brockmann et al 2011;Deissinger 2009). However, comparing international and national VET programs is difficult due to their lack of common standards for learning goals (Brockmann et al 2011). To be able to compare VET programs, it is very important to first develop reliable instruments assessing the profession-specific requirements of the VET programs (Deissinger et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the start of a paradigmatic shift toward learning outcomes, which is characteristic of an ever-increasing number of countries and, consequently, of their NQF (CEDEFOP, 2009;Ermenc, 2014;Ermenc & Mikulec, 2011). (b) The second difference lies in the fact that the EQF is also understood as a mechanism for strengthening lifelong learning, for which reason, it has tried to find connections between formal, nonformal, and informal education and learning, between general, academic education and vocational education and training (Ermenc, 2014;Ermenc & Mikulec, 2011), although precisely because of its development and function, it also transfers its vocational logic into the wider education system (Brockmann, Clarke, & Winch, 2011). (c) The third difference is that the EQF has linked itself to a changed view of the recognition of qualifications: The Lisbon Recognition Convention replaced the concept of nostrification with the concept of equivalence: For a qualification from a sending country to be recognized in a receiving country, it must be similar to the qualification in the receiving country in so far as it either enables access to the labor market in the receiving country or enables access to further education (Ermenc, 2014;Rauhvargers, 2009).…”
Section: The European Qualifications Framework For Lifelong Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%