Knowledge, skills and beetles: respecting the privacy of private experiences in medical education

Abstract

In medical education, we assess knowledge, skills, and a third category usually called values or attitudes. While knowledge and skills can be assessed, this third category consists of 'beetles', after the philosopher Wittgenstein's beetle-in-a-box analogy. The analogy demonstrates that private experiences such as pain and hunger are inaccessible to the public, and that we cannot know whether we all experience them in the same way. In this paper, we claim that unlike knowledge and skills, private experiences of medical learners cannot be objectively measured, assessed, or directly accessed in any way. If we try to do this anyway, we risk reducing them to knowledge and skills-thereby making curriculum design choices based on what can be measured rather than what is valuable education, and rewarding zombielike student behaviour rather than authentic development. We conclude that we should no longer use the model of representation to assess attitudes, emotions, empathy, and other beetles. This amounts to, first of all, shutting the door on objective assessment and investing in professional subjective assessment. Second, changing the way we define 'fuzzy concepts' in medical education, and stimulating conversations

<p>The Long-Term Effectiveness of Empathic Interventions in Medical Education: A Systematic Review</p>

“…Some have gone so far as to even argue that the measurement of individual empathy is unknowable. 54 The uncertainties around educational interventions to promote empathy only expand with a longer frame of reference. According to recent reviews, many interventions have only shown temporary effectiveness.…”

Mindfulness in medical education: coming of age

“…No matter how valid the scales might be, though, only a trained observer can determine whether those skills and qualities are applied appropriately and ethically-does this student not only know the words of empathy, but also apply them at the right moment, and equitably? There is no substitute for careful observation, both in real or simulated environments, and by their very nature, assessments based on careful observation are always intersubjective, contextual and evolving [11]. Outcomes also have to be clearly defined, and realistic.…”

How medical school alters empathy: Student love and break up letters to empathy for patients

“…In the case of OSCEs, educators may reconsider the utility of assessing ‘shows’ and ‘performances’ of empathy, for ‘show’ and ‘performance’ is precisely the level the OSCE occupies in Miller's pyramid 53 . Educators who regard empathy as a ‘way of being’ 8 are more likely to recognise that the mere show of compassion does not equate to the true act, and would reject an assessment that confuses the two 54 . If empathy is to be assessed at all, our preference would be real‐world clinical placement judgments made by tutors, as suggested by students in this study.…”