Knowledge Sharing Strategy and Emission Reduction Benefits of Low Carbon Technology Collaborative Innovation in the Green Supply Chain

Wang, Fuqiang; Li, Huimin; Cao, Yongchao; Zhang, Chengyi; Ran, Yunlong

doi:10.3389/fenvs.2021.783835

Cited by 13 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Existing literature has analyzed strategies or mechanisms of core enterprise from various perspectives, including environmental audits to address the risk of supplier non-compliance (Caro et al, 2018;Chen et al, 2020), incentive contracts to improve suppliers' capability and performance (Karaer et al, 2017;Yang and Chen, 2018;Wang et al, 2022), the design of information disclosure and communication mechanism (Wang et al, 2016;Cho et al, 2019;Kraft et al, 2020), and strategic sourcing basing on environmental sustainability standards (Chen et al, 2017;Agrawal et al, 2019;Wu et al, 2019). We focus on the effect of core enterprise's investment strategy in motivating supplier's environmental responsibility.…”

Section: Motivate Supplier Environmental Responsibility By Core Enter...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cooperate or not with knowledge-advantaged ENGO: Motivating supplier environmental responsibility of competitive core enterprises

Meng

Jiang

Jian

2022

Front. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, core enterprises are compelled to invest in the environmental responsibility of upstream suppliers, since their brand image and market share will be significantly impacted when suppliers fail to comply with environmental regulations. However, the effectiveness of the core enterprises’ investment efficiency is limited by insufficient environmental knowledge. Although cooperating with the knowledge-advantaged environmental non-governmental organization (ENGO) may be an effective solution, we observe from the recent examples that not all core enterprises are willing to cooperate in a competitive market. Within this context, we develop a theoretical model to investigate whether competitive core enterprises can benefit from cooperating with the knowledge-advantaged ENGO to motivate the supplier’s environmental responsibility. Our results show that cooperation incentivizes core enterprises’ investments in the supplier’s environmental responsibility, which in turn motivates better environmental responsibility of the supplier. However, we illustrate that cooperation is not necessarily the optimal strategy for core enterprises in the duopoly scenario. Specifically, as the knowledge absorption ability increases, a core enterprise may free-ride on another’s investment, shifting its strategic preference from cooperating to not cooperating. In addition, competition may stimulate the core enterprises’ investments and cooperation motivation, thus improving the total environmental effort and supply chain members’ profits. Our findings provide insights into the competitive core enterprises’ strategic choice regarding suppliers’ environmental responsibility management.

show abstract

Section: Motivate Supplier Environmental Responsibility By Core Enter...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Cooperate or not with knowledge-advantaged ENGO: Motivating supplier environmental responsibility of competitive core enterprises

Meng

Jiang

Jian

2022

Front. Environ. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In reality, the uncertainty of external factors also has a significant impact on the implementation of HDTS ( Sun and Gu, 2022 ). Specifically, changes in the operating environment of the medical system, unexpected personal situations of patients, and interference from other external factors are stochastic; therefore, consideration of stochastic factors can improve the accuracy of models ( Wang et al, 2022 ). Based on this, some scholars regard the strategy evolution process as a random jump between multiple states and use the traditional game to construct a stochastic game model, but complete rationality becomes the biggest constraint ( Rand et al, 2013 ).…”

Section: Further Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

How to promote the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system: A tripartite evolutionary game theory perspective

Chen

Zheng

et al. 2023

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Due to the disorderly access to medical care and inefficient use of health resources, the advancement of the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment is more valued in promoting health system reform. Hence, this article integrates prospect theory into an evolutionary game model of the local government health departments, the medical institutions, and the patients in the system promotion of the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment. The simulation shows the specific influencing mechanism of the psychological perceived value of game subjects. Then by introducing the stochastic evolutionary game model, the system promotion under different medical cultures is also discussed in detail. The results indicate that for local government health departments, the amount and duration of financial subsidies are the key factors influencing the game system’s evolution. For medical institutions, participating in the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system is relatively beneficial. For patients, the recovery rate in primary hospitals matters more than the cost of treatment. Changes in the risk sensitivity coefficient will cause the equilibrium of the game system to change. However, changes in the loss avoidance factor do not change the equilibrium and only have an impact on the speed of convergence. With the health departments’ intervention, patients in rural medical culture are more inclined to support the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system than those in urban or town medical culture. Therefore, in order to promote the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system, this article recommends that more attention should be paid to the regulatory role of health departments and the participation improvement of medical institutions and patients.

show abstract

“…However, there are relatively few studies examining the impact of carbon emissions trading, one of China's current important carbon emission reduction policies, on total factor productivity. In addition, related studies on the impact of carbon emission rights trading have also given more attention to carbon intensity, carbon emissions [17], carbon allocation [18], enterprise value [19], enterprise innovation [20], enterprise green innovation [21], and low-carbon technology collaborative sharing against the background of carbon emissions trading [22], and less research on the impact on agricultural enterprises' total factor productivity has been conducted.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research on the Policy Effect and Mechanism of Carbon Emission Trading on the Total Factor Productivity of Agricultural Enterprises

Hua

Zhu

Jia

2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Given the rural revitalization strategy in the new era, agricultural development is faced with the dual constraints of resources and the environment. Promoting the green development of agriculture is one of the important missions to solve major social issues in the new era. The implementation goal of the carbon emission trading system is to achieve a win-win situation between carbon emission reduction and green development. To evaluate the effectiveness of the carbon emission trading system on agricultural enterprises, this paper uses a double-difference model to analyze the policy effect and mechanism research path of the impact of the carbon emission trading system on the total factor productivity of agricultural enterprises. The results based on the panel data of listed agricultural companies from 2010 to 2020 show that (1) carbon emission trading rights have significantly improved the total factor productivity of agricultural enterprises; (2) green innovation in carbon emission trading rights have an impact on the total factor productivity of agricultural enterprises; and (3) heterogeneity analysis shows that the effect of carbon emission trading rights on the total factor productivity of agricultural enterprises mainly exists in large-scale, nonstate-owned, high-debt enterprises, enterprises in the eastern region, and enterprises with government subsidies. Therefore, in the future, China should continue to implement the current carbon emission trading rights system in air pollution control, and at the same time, it needs to be supplemented by government intervention and other means for long-term governance. In conclusion, the study provides a reference value for promoting the realization of the long-term goal of “low carbon” and “high quality” green development of agricultural economy and for making reasonable and effective behavioral decisions for the survival and development of enterprises.

show abstract

Knowledge Sharing Strategy and Emission Reduction Benefits of Low Carbon Technology Collaborative Innovation in the Green Supply Chain

Cited by 13 publications

References 63 publications

Cooperate or not with knowledge-advantaged ENGO: Motivating supplier environmental responsibility of competitive core enterprises

Cooperate or not with knowledge-advantaged ENGO: Motivating supplier environmental responsibility of competitive core enterprises

How to promote the hierarchical diagnosis and treatment system: A tripartite evolutionary game theory perspective

Research on the Policy Effect and Mechanism of Carbon Emission Trading on the Total Factor Productivity of Agricultural Enterprises

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About