2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2014.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge sharing in interest online communities: A comparison of posters and lurkers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
157
1
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(180 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
11
157
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…This personal inventory reveals that extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness are positively related to knowledge sharing intention. Lai and Chen (2014) examine the differences between posters and lurkers in knowledge-sharing. They find that posters are influenced by intrinsic motivational factors (i.e., enjoyment and knowledge self-efficacy), while lurkers are affected by extrinsic motivational factors (i.e., reciprocity).…”
Section: Personal Attributes and Online Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This personal inventory reveals that extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness are positively related to knowledge sharing intention. Lai and Chen (2014) examine the differences between posters and lurkers in knowledge-sharing. They find that posters are influenced by intrinsic motivational factors (i.e., enjoyment and knowledge self-efficacy), while lurkers are affected by extrinsic motivational factors (i.e., reciprocity).…”
Section: Personal Attributes and Online Knowledge Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topic has received growing research attention in recent years (e.g. Heo & Toomey, 2016;Jadin, Gnambs, & Batinic, 2013;Lai & Chen, 2014;Wei, Lin, Chen, An, & Yeh, 2015). Prior studies have focused on constructs associated with social capital theory (Chumg, Cooke, Fry, & Hung, 2015;Wasko & Faraj, 2005), social cognitive theory (Fang & Chiu, 2010), resource exchange theory (Chan & Li, 2010), uses and gratification theory (Chen, Yang, & Tang, 2013), and organizational citizenship behaviors (Chiu, Hsu, & Wang, 2006) and self-efficacy (Jin, Zhou, Lee, & Cheung, 2013;Papadopoulos, Stamati, & Nopparuch, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But there could also be underlying strategic reasons operating, due to the willingness to push towards the improvement in service/ product quality by posting a bad online review. Hence, the analysis of the difference between posters and lurkers in terms of motivation and incentives is another topic the literature is currently tackling (Lai and Chen, 2014;Liao and Chou, 2012). Differently, we consider the strand of literature investigating the content of reviews and those factors affecting ratings.…”
Section: The Drivers Of Individual Ratingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed questionnaire takes into account all issues connected with virtual knowledge sharing. Lai and Chen (2014) used the scale of reputation by Kankanhalli et al (2005) to identify motivating factors, mutuality by Davenport and Prusak (1998), joy in helping others by Wasko and Faraj (2000), knowledge of own efficiency by Spreitzer (1996), enthusiasm by Koh and Kim (2003), online activity by Jang and Ko (2010), joy by Koh and Kim (2003), and intention of sharing knowledge by Ajzen (1991). The research covered 324 users of the Mobile01 platform.…”
Section: Measurement Of Virtual Knowledge Sharing In Crowdsourcingmentioning
confidence: 99%