Knowledge Representation in the Social Semantic Web

Weller, Katrin

doi:10.1515/9783598441585

Cited by 30 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…That understanding of Web 2.5 completely matches the concept of the Social Semantic Web, which can be defined as a Web model in which social interactions on the Web lead to the creation of explicit and semantically rich knowledge representations [11,12,41,42]. The Social Semantic Web can be seen as a Web of collective knowledge systems, which are able to provide useful information based on human contributions and which get better as more people participate [11,12,41,42].…”

Section: Semantic Webmentioning

confidence: 85%

“…The Social Semantic Web can be seen as a Web of collective knowledge systems, which are able to provide useful information based on human contributions and which get better as more people participate [11,12,41,42]. The Social Semantic Web combines technologies, strategies and methodologies from the Semantic Web, social software and the Web 2.0 [41].…”

Section: Semantic Webmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

When the Social Meets the Semantic: Social Semantic Web or Web 2.5

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The social trend is progressively becoming the key feature of current Web understanding (Web 2.0). This trend appears irrepressible as millions of users, directly or indirectly connected through social networks, are able to share and exchange any kind of content, information, feeling or experience. Social interactions radically changed the user approach. Furthermore, the socialization of content around social objects provides new unexplored commercial marketplaces and business opportunities. On the other hand, the progressive evolution of the web towards the Semantic Web (or Web 3.0) provides a formal representation of knowledge based on the meaning of data. When the social meets semantics, the social intelligence can be formed in the context of a semantic environment in which user and community profiles as well as any kind of interaction is semantically represented (Semantic Social Web). This paper first provides a conceptual analysis of the second and third version of the Web model. That discussion is aimed at the definition of a middle concept (Web 2.5) resulting in the convergence and integration of key features from the current and next generation Web. The Semantic Social Web (Web 2.5) has a clear theoretical meaning, understood as the bridge between the overused Web 2.0 and the not yet mature Semantic Web (Web 3.0).

show abstract

Section: Semantic Webmentioning

confidence: 85%

Section: Semantic Webmentioning

confidence: 99%

When the Social Meets the Semantic: Social Semantic Web or Web 2.5

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Social Semantic Web can be seen as a Web of aggregate learning frameworks, which can give helpful data in view of human commitments and which show signs of improvement as more individuals take an interest [222]. The Social Semantic Web joins advancements, systems and strategies from the Semantic Web, social programming and the Web 2.0 [223].…”

Section: Figure 2-3 Social Semantic Information Spacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Semantically-enhanced advertisement recommender systems in social networks

Pazahr

Zapater

García‐Sánchez

et al. 2016

Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications and Services

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In the context of the Semantic Web it has been noted [15] that the use of controlled vocabularies is useful in the retrieval and discovery of resources tagged with repository concepts. Gray et al [16] phrased it this way; "Using SKOS as a representation for a vocabulary provides a unique identifier to tag resources with, and enables vocabulary aware applications to enhance…the exploitation of relationships between concepts in the vocabulary…..vocabulary aware applications can benefit from improvements in both precision and recall, for example when searching for bibliographic or science data.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reorienting Open Repositories to the Challenges of the Semantic Web: Experiences from FAO’s Contribution to the Resource Processing and Discovery Cycle in Repositories in the Agricultural Domain

Subirats¹,

Malapela²,

Dister³

et al. 2012

Communications in Computer and Information Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The use of widely-used metadata standards is essential to guarantee the visibility and retrieval of documents stored in open repositories. Attention should be paid to the creation and exchange of meaningful metadata to enhance interoperability amongst repositories and provide value added services. Since 2005 the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) provides the agricultural information management community with standards, services and tools to assist open repositories in benefiting from the advantages offered by Semantic Web publishing. This paper presents the work that FAO carries out in recommending standards for the encoding and exchange of metadata while also reviewing techniques to help navigate within open repositories and services. It talks about how to improve the visibility of repository content and explains the benefits of integrating subject vocabulary tools expressed in SKOS. It concludes with a presentation of use cases integrating these recommendations into DSpace and Drupal customizations.

show abstract

Knowledge Representation in the Social Semantic Web

Cited by 30 publications

References 0 publications

When the Social Meets the Semantic: Social Semantic Web or Web 2.5

When the Social Meets the Semantic: Social Semantic Web or Web 2.5

Semantically-enhanced advertisement recommender systems in social networks

Reorienting Open Repositories to the Challenges of the Semantic Web: Experiences from FAO’s Contribution to the Resource Processing and Discovery Cycle in Repositories in the Agricultural Domain

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About