Abstract:This article draws a model for viewing border politics based on experiences in Norway. The starting point is that the authorities do not count irregular resident migrants and openly refuse to help this group. While this makes governing this group harder, this choice makes sense from the point of view of the problem of sovereignty. Border policies in general and the decision not to count is a solution to ‘the predicament of permeable nation states in an age of migration’. What is not openly admitted is a tolera… Show more
“…Similarly, the numbers of deaths caused by cordial diseases has been reduced by 50% since 200850% since (NIPH 2019a. Hospitals conduct autopsies to learn from as many deaths as the finances allow (Johansen 2020). State organizations monitor the prevalence of illnesses and causes of death closely, and are prepared to react quickly if there are changes in threats to the lives of citizens.…”
Section: Curtailing Welfare For the Unworthymentioning
In Norway, the public and political debate is moving in the direction of treatment. This is in line with the tradition of the Nordic welfare state. However, it is argued, a treatment or welfare state approach to drugs can be as controlling as a policy based on legal punishments.
“…Similarly, the numbers of deaths caused by cordial diseases has been reduced by 50% since 200850% since (NIPH 2019a. Hospitals conduct autopsies to learn from as many deaths as the finances allow (Johansen 2020). State organizations monitor the prevalence of illnesses and causes of death closely, and are prepared to react quickly if there are changes in threats to the lives of citizens.…”
Section: Curtailing Welfare For the Unworthymentioning
In Norway, the public and political debate is moving in the direction of treatment. This is in line with the tradition of the Nordic welfare state. However, it is argued, a treatment or welfare state approach to drugs can be as controlling as a policy based on legal punishments.
“…Clearly, the failure of the state to control its borders suggested here was a troubling political issue. With asylum applications having fallen to their lowest point since 1989 to under-18,000 in 2010 (Blinder, 2019), and numbers defined as the problem, the presence of another subpopulation of non-citizens on the territory attesting to permeable borders (Johansen, 2018), turned state attention from "bogus" asylum seekers to (criminalized) undocumented or "illegal" migrants.…”
In the age of globalization, states exercise their sovereignty through the control of their physical and material borders. The perceived “migration crisis” of recent years has driven states in the Global North such as the UK, to increasingly fortify their borders, with policies fueled by popular anti-immigration rhetoric and panics around high levels of inward migration. This article documents and examines the power technologies and regimes of immigration practice known as the “hostile environment” as a field of conflict and struggle. The paper draws on Theresa May’s speech as then Home Secretary outlining the “hostile environment,” and news reports and commentaries detailing the enactment of these policy technologies. Of particular interest is the positioning of education within “hostile environment” regimes of practices, where we find the school weaponized for border control purposes. The paper concludes with considering what we as educators should be doing to counteract hostile forces against migrants and migration, so as to create more critical and compassionate individuals.
“…First they are not allowed to stay on Norwegian territory and being present is in itself disorderly. Secondly, their presence creates a political crisis, since it shows that the state is unable to maintain its borders (Johansen 2018a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I will use policy developments regarding irregular migrants as my example throughout this article, but this puts a limit on the level of analysis that can be presented. I have formerly conducted analyses of funnel policies relating to drug use and visiting Roma (Johansen 2013(Johansen , 2014a(Johansen , 2014b(Johansen , 2014c(Johansen , 2014d(Johansen , 2015(Johansen , 2018a(Johansen , 2018b(Johansen , 2018c(Johansen , 2018d, but the real topic is the emergence of certain political developments that transcend the particularities of individual fields. Stumpf (2006) inaugurated what has later become known as the crimmigration tradition of criminology.…”
NorwegianDenne artikkelen presenterer noen bestemte utviklingstrekk når det gjelder kontrollpolitikk, både i Norge og andre land det er vanlig å sammenligne med. Jeg har kalt det jeg finner for «traktpolitikk». Traktpolitikk innebærer å inndra bidrag fra forskjellige og i utgangspunktet uavhengige aktører, organisasjoner og institusjoner fra hele det politisk-administrative feltet. Bidragene blir tatt imot og videreført i den grad de passer inn i det politiske feltet fra før og bidrar til det overordnede målet på feltet. Påstanden er at traktpolitikk og dens rasjonalitet gjennomsyrer den politiske og administrative håndteringen av flere marginale grupper. Formålet med artikkelen er følgelig å redegjøre for hvordan denne politikken fungerer, om enn i skisseform. Artikkelen tar for seg den mer spesifikke kontrollen med irregulære migranter som eksempel, og kan følgelig også leses som en studie av dette feltet.Abstract EnglishThis article presents certain specific developments in control policy that have occurred in Norway and the countries it is commonly compared with. I have coined the term "funnelling policy" to describe what I have found. Funnelling policy involves the deduction of contributions from different and basically independent actors, organizations and institutions from the entire political-administrative field. The contributions are received and continued to the extent that they fit into the political field from before and contribute to the overall goal of the field. The claim is that funnelling policy and its rationality permeate the political and administrative handling of several marginalized groups. The purpose of the article is to explain how this policy functions, albeit in the form of a sketch. The article addresses the more specific control of irregular migrants as an example, and cantherefore also be read as a study of this field.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.