2015
DOI: 10.1007/s12564-015-9354-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge production in a constructed field: reflections on comparative and international education

Abstract: Adopting Maria Manzon's theoretical framework, which draws on Foucault and proposes that comparative education as an academic field is socially constructed, I suggest that the field is neither stable nor well defined. To demonstrate this,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These possibilities highlight certain trends in recent years, however, of first, a shift in interest from educational content to social and political contexts, and second, the nature of CIDE to cross thematic, disciplinary, methodological, and geographic borders (Foster et al, 2012). In a content analysis of the Comparative Education Review, Nordtveit (2015) noticed the lack of unifying features in the CIDE field in favour of certain "frequent elements": (1) a focus on the "national" as the primary unit of analysis for understanding education as both "comparative" and "international"; (2) a characteristic of CIDE's "academic practitioners" as interested in not only studying but improving the educational systems that they study, and (3) a focus on educational development.…”
Section: Teaching and Learning In Comparative International And Devel...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These possibilities highlight certain trends in recent years, however, of first, a shift in interest from educational content to social and political contexts, and second, the nature of CIDE to cross thematic, disciplinary, methodological, and geographic borders (Foster et al, 2012). In a content analysis of the Comparative Education Review, Nordtveit (2015) noticed the lack of unifying features in the CIDE field in favour of certain "frequent elements": (1) a focus on the "national" as the primary unit of analysis for understanding education as both "comparative" and "international"; (2) a characteristic of CIDE's "academic practitioners" as interested in not only studying but improving the educational systems that they study, and (3) a focus on educational development.…”
Section: Teaching and Learning In Comparative International And Devel...mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Bjorn Nordtveit (), editor of the CIES premier journal Comparative Education Review, asserts that the majority of submissions to the Review come from scholars whose native language is not English. Irrespective of these diverse backgrounds, he finds that the field is still dominated by Western social science discourses that marginalise and silence alternative voices (Nordtveit, ).…”
Section: A Postcolonial View Of Cie As An Actor–actant Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still others are spatial, representing disciplines, hierarchies of power, and geographies of travel, birthplace and schooling. The continuous influx and departure of people moving through networks signifies instability and fluidity of the CIE boundaries and as poststructuralist comparativists like Nordtveit () maintain, the perpetual construction of CIE as a field.…”
Section: A Postcolonial View Of Cie As An Actor–actant Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%