2004
DOI: 10.1136/sti.2004.009977
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge of post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for HIV among general practitioners in northern Sydney

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
14
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
14
2
Order By: Relevance
“…17,18 In the study conducted by C Ooi et al 24.6% were aware of the 72 hour time restrictions. 20 In our study 31% answered correctly the ideal HIV-PEP regimen following high risk needle stick injury and similar finding was observed by patracia et al (32.7%). 18 In present study 71% answered correctly the duration of HIV-PEP which is lower than study conducted by Patracia et al 18 91% told HIV-PEP should be administered for accidental non-occupational exposure to HIV which is higher than study conducted by Patracia et al (61%).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17,18 In the study conducted by C Ooi et al 24.6% were aware of the 72 hour time restrictions. 20 In our study 31% answered correctly the ideal HIV-PEP regimen following high risk needle stick injury and similar finding was observed by patracia et al (32.7%). 18 In present study 71% answered correctly the duration of HIV-PEP which is lower than study conducted by Patracia et al 18 91% told HIV-PEP should be administered for accidental non-occupational exposure to HIV which is higher than study conducted by Patracia et al (61%).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…18 Our study observation is higher than the other studies conducted by C Ooi et al (68%) and Biniam Mathewos et al (48%). 20,21 In the present study 81% told HIV (PEP) is effective in preventing HIV transmission, which is lower than study conducted by Patricia A et al (99.4%). 18 It is higher than study conducted by Biniam Mathewos et al (60.5%).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…[10] in general practitioners (68.8%), but less than that reported by Agaba et al . [7] in family physicians (97.7%), Nwankwo and Aniebue[12] in the trainee surgeons (93.5%) and Chen et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These studies indicate a clear need for the training and education of doctors, the other health care workers and the general public on the use and availability of PEP. Lack of knowledge of the availability of PEP on the part of the care provider may translate to missed opportunities for its prescription and lead to an increased risk of seroconversion [10].…”
Section: Prevention Of Occupational Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%