Knowledge of Pakistani Dentist Towards Light Curing Units- A Cross Sectional Analysis

Alam, Beenish Fatima; Medical, Bahria; Nayab, Talha; Najmi, Arqam; Khan, Umaima

doi:10.25301/jpda.292.81

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…QTH were well known in the past and had a halogen bulb that needed to be cooled frequently, and a fan that helped disperse the unwanted heat away from the bulb. Although they delivered a broad emission spectrum, they required an exposure time of 30 to 40 seconds to cure a 2 mm increment of resin material, which generated a large amount of heat that affected the life span of the device [ 10 , 11 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge and Attitude of Dental Clinicians towards Light-Curing Units: A Cross-Sectional Study

Al-Senan

Ageel

Aldosari

et al. 2021

International Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives. Light curing is crucial when applying composite resin restorations. Complete polymerization of the resin depends on delivering adequate light energy to it. Dental clinicians may be unaware of the importance of proper light-curing techniques. This study aimed at evaluating and comparing the level of knowledge of general practitioners (GPs) and specialists (SPs) regarding light-curing units. Materials and Methods. An electronic survey was conducted online among GPs and SPs of various specialties, working in the governmental sector in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Collected data were analyzed for statistical significance. Results. 310 dentists were included in the study. Nearly half of the GPs (45.9%) and more than half of SPs (56.8%) use light-emitting diode (LED) type light-curing units (LCUs). 36.9% of GPs and 29.6% of SPs were unsure about the type of LCUs they use in their dental clinics. 10.8% of GPs and 8.5% of SPs knew the proper term of the power output of LCU. 52.2% of the GPs and 55.7% of SPs were wrong about advancements in technology of LED LCUs. Regarding the use of radiometer, 48.2% of SPs and 35.1% of GPs had responded wrongly, and 37.7% of SPs and 52.3% of GPs were not familiar with the device, showing a statistical significance p = 0.040 . There was no statistical significance observed in the responses pertaining to their years of experience, expected for two questions. Conclusion. Both GPs and SPs displayed inadequate knowledge regarding the use of LCUs. Further educational programs are recommended to spread awareness about the handling of LCUs among dental clinicians.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%