Knowledge of modifiable risk factors of Coronary Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (CASHD) among a sample in India

Abstract

BackgroundThe prevalence of Coronary Atherosclerotic Heart Disease (CASHD) is increasing in India. Several modifiable risk factors contribute directly to this disease burden. Public knowledge of such risk factors among the urban Indian population is largely unknown. This investigation attempts to quantify knowledge of modifiable risk factors of CASHD as sampled among an Indian population at a large metropolitan hospital.MethodsA hospital-based, cross sectional study was conducted at All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), a major tertiary care hospital in New Delhi, India. Participants (n = 217) recruited from patient waiting areas in the emergency room were provided with standardized questionnaires to assess their knowledge of modifiable risk factors of CASHD. The risk factors specifically included smoking, hypertension, elevated cholesterol levels, diabetes mellitus and obesity. Identifying 3 or less risk factors was regarded as a poor knowledge level, whereas identifying 4 or more risk factors was regarded as a good knowledge level. A multiple logistic regression model was used to isolate independent demographic markers predictive of a participant's level of knowledge.Results41% of the sample surveyed had a good level of knowledge. 68%, 72%, 73% and 57% of the population identified smoking, obesity, hypertension, and high cholesterol correctly, respectively. 30% identified diabetes mellitus as a modifiable risk factor of CASHD. In multiple logistic regression analysis independent demographic predictors of a good knowledge level with a statistically significant (p < 0.05) adjusted odds ratio (aOR) were: routine exercise of moderate intensity, aOR 8.41 (compared to infrequent or no exercise), no history of smoking, aOR 8.25, and former smokers, aOR 48.28 (compared to current smokers). Although statistically insignificant, a trend towards a good knowledge level was associated with higher levels of education.ConclusionAn Indian population in a hospital setting shows a lack of knowledge pertaining to modifiable risk factors of CASHD. By isolating demographic predictors of poor knowledge, such as current smokers and persons who do not exercise regularly, educational interventions can be effectively targeted and implemented as primary and secondary prevention strategies to reduce the burden of CASHD in India.

Knowledge on Risk Factors of Coronary Heart Disease among Middle Aged Administrative Staffs of Kathmandu

“…Regarding the presence of hypertension and diabetes, 16.2% and 9.2% of the total respondents had hypertension and diabetes respectively which is congruous with the study done by (Saeed et al;2009) which showed 8.9 % hypertension, 6.6% diabetes. Similarly, another study done in Pakistan by 2005) showed that 14.9 % had hypertension and 5.9 % had diabetes respectively.…”

Factors Associated With the General Public Knowledge and Awareness of Cardiovascular Diseases and its Risk Factors in Penang – Malaysia

“…Jafary et al (2005) found that the education level, income and residence are positively associated with the knowledge on CHD in Pakistan. Similar studies in India and Jordan indicated the same association [18,19]. Yahya et al (2012) found positive association between knowledge, attitude and practice independent of socio-demographic factors among female patients in primary care clinic in Kelantan-Malaysia.…”

Knowledge and prevalence of risk factors for arterial hypertension and blood pressure pattern among bankers and traffic wardens in Ilorin, Nigeria

“…3 Hypertension is now a burden to the society and several modifiable risk factors contribute directly to this burden. 4 High job strain has been associated with significantly higher diastolic blood pressure of 4.5mmHg during working hours 5 and it has been proven that chefs showed one risk factor more than office workers. 6 There is also a dearth of information on diet related chronic diseases in West Africa creating a challenge for comparative research for intervention purposes.…”