Knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the USA, the UK and Australia: an international survey

Abstract

ObjectiveTo measure knowledge and awareness of human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the USA, the UK and Australia.MethodsParticipants in the USA, UK and Australia completed an anonymous web-based survey measuring awareness and knowledge of HPV (n=2409). We report analyses on a subsample of 1473 men and women in the USA (n=617), UK (n=404) and Australia (n=452) who had heard of HPV and completed questions about HPV testing.ResultsOverall, 50% of the sample (742/1473) had heard of HPV testing. Awareness of HPV testing was higher in the USA (62%) than in the UK (44%) and Australia (40%) (p<0.001). Among those who had heard of HPV testing, the mean knowledge score (out of 6) was 2.78 (SD: 1.49). No significant differences in knowledge score were found between the countries but, overall, women scored significantly higher than men (2.96 vs 2.52, p<0.001).ConclusionsAwareness of HPV testing among people who have heard of HPV is higher in the USA than in the UK and Australia, but overall knowledge is low. This has important implications in those countries where HPV testing is being used in cervical screening. Increasing knowledge about the implications of HPV test results may help minimise any negative psychological consequences associated with HPV testing. Raising awareness in men could become increasingly important if HPV testing is introduced into the management of other cancers where HPV plays an aetiological role.

Anxiety and distress following receipt of results from routine HPV primary testing in cervical screening: The psychological impact of primary screening (PIPS) study

“…However, although an HPV negative result offers better protection from cervical cancer than normal cytology, women in our study felt similarly reassured after receiving an HPV negative result compared to normal cytology. Low knowledge of HPV and the benefits associated with an HPV negative result may partially account for this . Normal or “good” results may also demand little cognitive attention and therefore reduce the likelihood of differentiation …”

Awareness of cervical cancer risk factors and symptoms: cross‐sectional community survey in post‐conflict northern Uganda

“…In this study, no participant explicitly mentioned the HPV although 82% reported that a sexually transmitted virus may cause cervical cancer. Very limited awareness of the viral aetiology of cervical cancer and HPV vaccination has been observed in high‐income countries as recently as 2004 before the wider availability of HPV vaccination and supporting information campaigns when awareness improved . The findings in Uganda are reminiscent of the limited awareness of these factors without public education efforts and in the absence of nationwide HPV vaccination.…”

The recommended interval for cervical cancer screening: Victorian women's attitudes to an extended interval

“…It is not known what impact the MSAC recommendation changing the primary test to HPV testing may have on women and whether or not this will make the task of communication more difficult. We know that Australian women do not have a great understanding of HPV and it is likely that this new screening test will initially be poorly understood by women 21,22 . However, it may be that changing the primary cervical screening test to an HPV test will make it easier for women to accept that less frequent tests are needed.…”