Abstract:Background
Knowledge of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is believed to be important in altering risk behaviour, improving engagement in care, and promoting willingness to initiate HCV treatment. We assessed factors associated with HCV knowledge and treatment willingness amongst people who inject drugs (PWID) in an era of direct acting antivirals.
Methods
Data were derived from three prospective cohort studies of PWID in Vancouver, Canada, between June 2014 and May 2015. HCV knowledge and treatment willingness were a… Show more
“…Many practitioners stated that they did not feel that offering it was appropriate in all stages of treatment and that a harm reduction kit was not appropriate for patients receiving DAA. In contrast, studies using a multipronged approach have, in fact, demonstrated successful treatment in PWID [35][36][37][38][39][40]. This signals a lack of knowledge among practitioners, which contributes to poorer health outcomes [27].…”
Introduction and Aims
People who inject drugs (PWID) constitute the largest reservoir of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Although effective medications are available and access to care is universal in Italy, the proportion of PWID receiving appropriate care remains low.
Design and Methods
To identify the major barriers for PWID to HCV treatment we surveyed a large sample of practitioners working in outpatient addiction centres (SerDs). The survey was conducted in two stages and involved 30.3% of SerDs operating in Italy. In the first, SerD physicians completed a questionnaire designed with a Delphi structure. In the second, SerD practitioners completed a targeted questionnaire to identify barriers to four SerD services in HCV management: screening, referral, treatment and harm reduction.
Results
The first‐stage questionnaire, in which a Delphi and RAND‐UCLA method was used, revealed a lack of agreement among the physicians about barriers to health care. The more detailed second‐stage questionnaire indicated the barriers to delivering specific SerD services. As regarded the delivery of all four services, the major reasons for treating <50% of patients were: physician and nurse understaffing, technical, economic and logistic issues. In contrast, the practitioners who responded that they follow protocol recommendations often deliver all four services to >50% of patients.
Discussion and Conclusions
HCV treatment remains out of reach for many PWID attending a drug treatment centre in Italy. To meet the World Health Organisation (WHO) target, there is a need to increase economic, technical and staff support at treatment centres using the protocols and the universal health care already in place.
“…Many practitioners stated that they did not feel that offering it was appropriate in all stages of treatment and that a harm reduction kit was not appropriate for patients receiving DAA. In contrast, studies using a multipronged approach have, in fact, demonstrated successful treatment in PWID [35][36][37][38][39][40]. This signals a lack of knowledge among practitioners, which contributes to poorer health outcomes [27].…”
Introduction and Aims
People who inject drugs (PWID) constitute the largest reservoir of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Although effective medications are available and access to care is universal in Italy, the proportion of PWID receiving appropriate care remains low.
Design and Methods
To identify the major barriers for PWID to HCV treatment we surveyed a large sample of practitioners working in outpatient addiction centres (SerDs). The survey was conducted in two stages and involved 30.3% of SerDs operating in Italy. In the first, SerD physicians completed a questionnaire designed with a Delphi structure. In the second, SerD practitioners completed a targeted questionnaire to identify barriers to four SerD services in HCV management: screening, referral, treatment and harm reduction.
Results
The first‐stage questionnaire, in which a Delphi and RAND‐UCLA method was used, revealed a lack of agreement among the physicians about barriers to health care. The more detailed second‐stage questionnaire indicated the barriers to delivering specific SerD services. As regarded the delivery of all four services, the major reasons for treating <50% of patients were: physician and nurse understaffing, technical, economic and logistic issues. In contrast, the practitioners who responded that they follow protocol recommendations often deliver all four services to >50% of patients.
Discussion and Conclusions
HCV treatment remains out of reach for many PWID attending a drug treatment centre in Italy. To meet the World Health Organisation (WHO) target, there is a need to increase economic, technical and staff support at treatment centres using the protocols and the universal health care already in place.
“…Particularly people who inject drugs [ 2 ] need to be addressed by customized concepts. A higher knowledge of HCV is associated with increased willingness for HCV treatment [ 37 ] and thus a general lack of awareness of HCV is still a major concern [ 38 ]. Moser et al [ 39 ] recently described a promising approach to address patients who are on opioid substitution therapy.…”
SummaryBackground and aimHepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy should be considered without delay in all patients with significant (SIGFIB) or advanced liver fibrosis (ADVFIB). We aimed to investigate the rates of treatment initiation with interferon-free regimens within a screening program for SIGFIB/ADVFIB in human immunodeficiency virus/HCV coinfected patients (HIV/HCV).MethodsThe FIB-4 was calculated in all HIV/HCV from 2014–2016. HIV/HCV were counselled by the HIV clinic and referred to the Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology for transient elastography (TE) and evaluation for HCV therapy. Patients were stratified by FIB-4 of ≥1.45 (established cut-off for ruling out ADVFIB) and SIGFIB/ADVFIB were defined by liver stiffness >7.1 kPa/>9.5 kPa, respectively.ResultsAmong 1348 HIV+ patients, 16% (210/1348) had detectable HCV-RNA. One hundred HIV/HCV had a FIB-4 ≥1.45. Among these, 57% (57/100) underwent TE. The majority of these patients had SIGFIB (75%; 43/57) or ADVFIB (37%; 21/57), however, interferon-free treatment was initiated in only 56% (24/43).In addition, fifty-two percent (57/110) of HIV/HCV with FIB-4 <1.45 underwent TE. Interestingly, 40% (23/57) and 18% (10/57) of these patients showed SIGFIB or even ADVFIB, respectively, and 78% (18/23) finally received interferon-free treatment. Overall, only 20% (42/210) of HIV/HCV received interferon-free treatment.ConclusionFIB-4 was not useful for ruling out SIGFIB/ADVFIB in our cohort of HIV/HCV. Treatment was initiated only in a small proportion (20%) of HIV/HCV during the first 2 years of interferon-free treatment availability, although the observed proportion of patients with SIGFIB (assessed by TE) was considerably higher (58%). Thus, it requires the ongoing combined efforts of both HIV and HCV specialists to increase treatment uptake rates in this special population.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi: 10.1007/s00508-017-1231-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
“…Amongst PWID and other vulnerable populations, rapid testing has been shown to substantially increase coverage and referral rates . To date, many services have not been developed for vulnerable populations such as the homeless, PWID and prisoners, which must both contend with numerous social determinants that contribute to poor quality of life and poor social functioning as well as health inequalities . It should be emphasized that HCV treatment should be offered based on clinical rather than social factors or injecting‐related behaviours , underlining the necessity of overcoming obstacles to HCV treatment delivery to PWID.…”
Section: The Model Of Care (Moc): a Tool For Increasing Treatment Covmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.