2012
DOI: 10.1177/0149206311432640
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks

Abstract: A large and growing body of empirical research shows that social relationships and the networks these relationships constitute are influential in explaining the processes of knowledge creation, diffusion, absorption, and use. The authors refer to such networks as "knowledge networks." They advance an understanding of knowledge networks at multiple levels by conducting a systematic review and analysis of empirical research published on this topic in leading management, psychology, sociology, and economics journ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

21
730
1
36

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 845 publications
(848 citation statements)
references
References 243 publications
(388 reference statements)
21
730
1
36
Order By: Relevance
“…The positive effect that internal cohesion can have on the network formation process in general and knowledge transfer in particular has been documented across a large number of studies (Phelps et al 2012), including the online context. For example, Kumar et al (2009) established that in an online knowledge sharing forum that an individual was more likely to receive a response to a question from a colleague when cohesion in their network neighborhood was high.…”
Section: Theoretical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The positive effect that internal cohesion can have on the network formation process in general and knowledge transfer in particular has been documented across a large number of studies (Phelps et al 2012), including the online context. For example, Kumar et al (2009) established that in an online knowledge sharing forum that an individual was more likely to receive a response to a question from a colleague when cohesion in their network neighborhood was high.…”
Section: Theoretical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A number of factors, including physical proximity (Hansen and Løvås, 2004;Salomon and Martin, 2008), social similarity (Loyd et al, 2010), knowledge overlap (Simon, 1991), the strength of the relationship between the source and a recipient (Aral and Van Alstyne, 2011) and even properties of the knowledge being shared (Szulanski, 1996), can influence the knowledge transfer process (Argote et al 2003;Phelps et al 2012). While fully recognizing the importance of these factors, we consider how the presence of strong ties inside a community or network neighborhood ("internal cohesion") influences the transfer of knowledge from a source to a potential recipient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge creation, adoption and transfer depend on the way individuals and organizations interact with one another. Knowledge networks have been defined as the collaboration between two or more actors with the strategic purpose of creating or using new knowledge, enabling interactive learning between the knowledge workers (Kreis-Hoyer & Grünberg, 2004;Phelps, Heidl, & Wadhwa, 2012). Information entering the knowledge network connects with existing knowledge, transfers between the knowledge workers, and eventually creates new knowledge outputs (Kreis-Hoyer & Grünberg, 2004).…”
Section: Knowledge Creation In Network: Background and Gaps In The Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In return, the literature on evidence-based policy-making can add important insights on the role of public policy in incentivizing research and knowledge production on real-world problems. Phelps et al (2012) argue in their assessment of the research literature on knowledge networks that understanding the influence of the institutional environment on knowledge networks and outputs requires further research. There may be an opportunity for linking insights from these two strands of literature.…”
Section: Knowledge Creation In Network: Background and Gaps In The Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technological innovation depends largely on the partnerships they coordinate with other companies within the industry [1]. As a substrate of knowledge transferring between high-tech enterprises, high-tech innovation network has an important impact on the dissemination process of knowledge between enterprises [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%