Knowledge management strategies, intellectual capital, and innovation performance: a comparison between high- and low-tech firms

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to analyse the complementary role of structural and relational capital (as the outcomes of codification and personalisation knowledge management strategies) in renewal capital and innovation in high- and low-tech companies. Design/methodology/approach The primary data, which were collected through a structured questionnaire from 180 Spanish companies, are analysed using structural equation modelling based on partial least squares. Findings Overall, the study offers three fundamental findings. First, it demonstrates the outstanding role of renewal capital as an intellectual capital (IC) component; second, it provides a conceptual analysis of the connection between knowledge management strategies and IC; and third, it highlights the necessity of considering the technological level of the firm as a contingency variable affecting the IC–innovation relationship. Research limitations/implications The study has three apparent limitations: The sample of firms is restricted to Spanish companies, data concerning the main study variables were collected from only one person at each firm, and not all of the possible components of IC were included in the research model. Practical implications Business practitioners can find useful guidelines for making efficient use of knowledge resources when boosting innovation performance, depending on the technological level of their firms. Originality/value Although many studies have tried to disentangle the IC–innovation connection, this study is unique, as it considers knowledge management strategies, a novel combination of IC components and the level of technological sophistication in the same analysis.

Intellectual Capital, Technological Innovation and Firm Performance: Evidence from China’s Manufacturing Sector

“…The knowledge and experiences can promote firm's innovation because firms generally utilize them to generate new products or services [52]. Most findings [53][54][55][56][57] suggested SC positively affect innovation performance. However, Zhang and Lv [14] found the relation between SC and technological innovation is insignificant in Chinese high-technology manufacturing firms.…”

“…In addition, there is an incomplete measurement of SC. Guided by previous literature [5,42,55,56,79], Pulic [15] VAIC TM model is modified to measure IC by adding one variable, RC. This measure is designed to indicate IC efficiency of a company.…”

Archetypes of incumbents’ strategic responses to digital innovation

“…therefore, firms' effort to tackle digital disruption may as well entail a redefinition of their knowledge management strategies (Buenechea-Elberdin et al, 2018;Cabrilo and Dahms, 2018).…”

Impact of Age Management on Sustainability in Czech Organisations

“…Loss of this dynamic leads to a loss of the market leader position [38,39]. On the other hand, organisations that do not create the conditions for knowledge management and the knowledge strategy in development are lagging behind their competitors and, over time, the asymmetry between them increases [40,41]. Knowledge is becoming an important resource for coping with uncertainties and turbulence and the resulting influences and threats that may lead to crises in organisations or even to the termination of their business activities [35,36,42].…”