2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-19433-7_47
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Graph Induction Enabling Recommending and Trend Analysis: A Corporate Research Community Use Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use cross-entropy loss as standard in machine translation whereas, in teacher forcing, the model regards the translation problem as a one-to-one mapping process and maximizes the log-likelihood of generating the linearized facts given the input text. As reported in (Mihindukulasooriya et al 2022), our KnowGL model outperforms (F1 = 70.74) both a standard IE pipeline system (F1 = 42.50) and the current state-of-the-art generative IE model (F1 = 68.93) (Josifoski et al 2022). For the evaluation, we use the test set released with the REBEL dataset.…”
Section: Knowledge Generationmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We use cross-entropy loss as standard in machine translation whereas, in teacher forcing, the model regards the translation problem as a one-to-one mapping process and maximizes the log-likelihood of generating the linearized facts given the input text. As reported in (Mihindukulasooriya et al 2022), our KnowGL model outperforms (F1 = 70.74) both a standard IE pipeline system (F1 = 42.50) and the current state-of-the-art generative IE model (F1 = 68.93) (Josifoski et al 2022). For the evaluation, we use the test set released with the REBEL dataset.…”
Section: Knowledge Generationmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…(SUBJECT, RELATION, OB-JECT), grounded with a given well-defined ontology (Hogan et al 2021). The usage of formal languages to represent KGs enables unambiguous access to data and facilitates automatic reasoning capabilities that enhance downstream applications, such as analytics, knowledge discovery or recommendations (Mihindukulasooriya et al 2022).…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of these requirements are of common nature for semantic knowledge graphs like R1, R2, R5 and therefore support the applicability of this technology. We consider the requirements R3, R4, R5, R7, R8, R9 more specific for Digital Twins and do not see them in other applications [22,24].…”
Section: Requirements For Semantic Digital Threadsmentioning
confidence: 99%