Abstract:Distributed Innovation is an emerging framework for a novel method of new product/service development, where knowledge from within and outside the organisation is shared in an evolutionary dialogue, which consistently produces high quality results. Literature on open source software development and new product development involving ‘lead users’, are the main contributors to the discussion about the creative potential locked within service users. There is a growing thread of literature which seems to apply the … Show more
“…The public sector must implement innovation to respond to the rising expectations of citizens as they compare public services with the improvements in service delivery accomplished by the private sector (Altshuler & Behn, 2010). Thus, citizens demand not only high quality and more usercentric services from the government but also services designed and often delivered in collaboration with citizens and community sector partners (Bowden, 2005). As highlighted by the Director General of IP Australia: "Citizen expectations of public service quality have risen while at the same time there is an increasing pressure on public budgets for greater efficiency, productivity, and cost reductions.…”
The purpose of this paper was to identify common themes from archival records related to innovation in the Australian Public Service (APS). A thematic analysis was conducted to review and evaluate archival records which consisted of transcripts from senior manager presentations at Innovation Month seminars from 2014 to 2018 and other related official documents. This empirical study addressed innovation from the leaders’ perspective, reflecting upon their experience. Analysing themes within archival records helped to gain insights from various perspectives of leaders on how they regard an innovation agenda for the APS. Three themes emerged from archival records: (1) innovation characteristics; (2) drivers of innovation; and (3) barriers to innovation. Synthesis of these drivers and barriers can provide important insights for senior APS managers on how they can enhance their organisations’ ability to innovate in order to respond to digital disruption challenges and opportunities. Variety of perspectives with leader’s perceptions informs about authors’ selection of the research question among consistent patterns and legitimates the salient themes as input for QSR NVivo 11.
“…The public sector must implement innovation to respond to the rising expectations of citizens as they compare public services with the improvements in service delivery accomplished by the private sector (Altshuler & Behn, 2010). Thus, citizens demand not only high quality and more usercentric services from the government but also services designed and often delivered in collaboration with citizens and community sector partners (Bowden, 2005). As highlighted by the Director General of IP Australia: "Citizen expectations of public service quality have risen while at the same time there is an increasing pressure on public budgets for greater efficiency, productivity, and cost reductions.…”
The purpose of this paper was to identify common themes from archival records related to innovation in the Australian Public Service (APS). A thematic analysis was conducted to review and evaluate archival records which consisted of transcripts from senior manager presentations at Innovation Month seminars from 2014 to 2018 and other related official documents. This empirical study addressed innovation from the leaders’ perspective, reflecting upon their experience. Analysing themes within archival records helped to gain insights from various perspectives of leaders on how they regard an innovation agenda for the APS. Three themes emerged from archival records: (1) innovation characteristics; (2) drivers of innovation; and (3) barriers to innovation. Synthesis of these drivers and barriers can provide important insights for senior APS managers on how they can enhance their organisations’ ability to innovate in order to respond to digital disruption challenges and opportunities. Variety of perspectives with leader’s perceptions informs about authors’ selection of the research question among consistent patterns and legitimates the salient themes as input for QSR NVivo 11.
“…Te zewnętrzne wynikają z potrzeby odpowiedzi na niezadowolenie społeczne związane z niewystarczającą jakością usług świadczonych na rzecz społeczeństwa lub z potrzebą wprowadzania instrumentów, które stymulowałyby zrównoważony rozwój (Glor, 2001, Bowden, 2005. Czynniki te uzupełniane są przez motywacje wewnętrzne, przede wszystkim związane z procesami uczenia się w organizacjach.…”
Section: Determinanty Innowacji W Sektorze Publicznymunclassified
Dzięki innowacjom w sektorze publicznym możliwe jest zaspokajanie potrzeb zgłaszanych przez społeczeństwo oraz realizacja celów społeczno-gospodarczych. Ich celem jest również dostarczanie usług i dóbr publicznych coraz wyższej jakości i w coraz bardziej efektywny sposób, dzięki czemu poprawia się dostęp do informacji, szybkość dostarczania usług dla przedsiębiorstw i mieszkańców oraz konkurencyjność firm. Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja kluczowych determinant innowacji w sektorze publicznym na przykładzie Polski. Dokonano analizy najważniejszych instrumentów przyczyniających się do wzrostu innowacyjności w sektorze publicznym i mechanizmów, dzięki którym poprawia się jakość zarządzania w administracji publicznej. Wśród zewnętrznych czynników wpływających na innowacje w sektorze publicznym dużo miejsca poświęcono polityce Unii Europejskiej oraz wymogom związanym z dostosowaniem do określonych standardów. W badaniu wykorzystano analizę literatury, modele logiczne obrazujące związki przyczynowo-skutkowe oraz wywiady indywidualne z przedstawicielami administracji centralnej.
“…In fact, Polanyi was a pioneer in bringing into focus the concept of intellectuals as a "scientific community" (Lowenberg & Yu, 1992). Some of the ideas from Polanyi's model have made their way into organization research in the areas of knowledgeintensive organizations, "post-bureaucratic" organizational practices, and distributed innovation (e.g., Bowden, 2005;Grey & Sturdy, 2009, 2010.…”
Public administration scholars face increasingly diverse demands for their output, from calls for social embeddedness to interest in sustainable policy solutions. The intellectual networks that produce scholarly publications are largely legacy systems that have not been updated to meet current demands and thus are overdue for some self-reflection. A framework for intellectual network analysis from the philosopher Michael Polanyi is presented as a platform to encourage discussion of issues related to scholarly intellectual networks. Polanyi's framework describes certain characteristics and necessary features of sustainable intellectual networks, but it also contains an inherent conflict that is analyzed from an agency perspective. An alternative approach is discussed as a possible remedy for the conflict. Areas for further research and theory on intellectual networks are suggested.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.