1999
DOI: 10.1108/13673279910304041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge flows in innovation networks: a comparative analysis of Japanese and US high‐technology firms

Abstract: The Japanese firm and the “traditional” US firm have different inter‐firm knowledge systems; in particular, Japanese firms tend to exchange information more frequently with their main suppliers, customers and other kinds of organizations (i.e. non‐profit organizations). As a result, they tend to develop new products and processes faster than the “traditional” US firm. Shows that non‐Japanese high‐technology firms that adopt Japanese‐style networks tend also to develop new products and processes faster than the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They found some tentative evidence that companies operating in terms of “the local strategic network” are more innovative than those operating in terms of “the local self‐sufficiency”. Echeverri‐Carroll (1999) examined knowledge flows in innovation networks and compared “traditional” US firms and Japanese firms. The study found that Japanese firms tend to exchange information more frequently with their main suppliers, customers and other kinds of organizations (i.e.…”
Section: Innovation and Network Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found some tentative evidence that companies operating in terms of “the local strategic network” are more innovative than those operating in terms of “the local self‐sufficiency”. Echeverri‐Carroll (1999) examined knowledge flows in innovation networks and compared “traditional” US firms and Japanese firms. The study found that Japanese firms tend to exchange information more frequently with their main suppliers, customers and other kinds of organizations (i.e.…”
Section: Innovation and Network Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several researches have been undertaken on knowledge flows in various areas including software development (Zhuge, 2002), R&D activities (Fang et al, 2002), high-technology firms (Echeverri-Carroll, 1999), professional firms (Baumard, 2002), and multinational corporations (Foss and Knowledge and Process Management CASE STUDY Pedersen, 2002;Gupta and Govindarajan, 2000;Schulz and Jobe, 2001). Zhuge (2002) proposes a knowledge-flow management framework for distributed team software development.…”
Section: Knowledge-flow Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various themes that have emerged in the KM literature, a few imperatives stand out: e.g. formation of knowledge community, in which networks of people are considered the most critical element of successful KM implementation (Offsey, 1997;Martiny, 1998;Rowley, 2000), and focusing on innovation to realize the resultant benefits of KM (Brand, 1998;Pe Ârez-Bustamante, 1999;Swan et al, 1999;Echeverri-Carroll, 1999). The need, plans, implementations and reports of results of KM is ubiquitous, ranging from the consulting industry (Martiny, 1998) to the pharmaceutical industry (Chase, 1997;Koretz and Lee, 1998) to law firms (Terrett, 1998).…”
Section: Electronic Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%