2018
DOI: 10.1111/lsq.12219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge, Expertise, and Committee Power in the Contemporary Congress

Abstract: Scholars, practitioners, and observers typically portray committee influence as rooted in traditional congressional processes and practices, which are thought to provide committees with powerful opportunities to block and shape legislative proposals. The erosion of regular order processes suggests these traditional processes cannot underlie committee power in the contemporary Congress. Drawing on a mixed‐methods approach of interviews with congressional staff and an original data set of every amendment offered… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The legal rules that structure executive‐legislative information disputes may also have implications for the information asymmetries and power dynamics between party leaders and rank‐and‐file members of Congress. Not only can legislative leaders capitalize on knowledge and expertise to shape the legislative process (e.g., Curry 2015; 2019), but the law shapes executive incentives in a way that prioritizes leaders in the oversight process. Legislative leaders have both legal and political sanctioning mechanisms for noncompliance.…”
Section: Legal Developments In the Trump Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The legal rules that structure executive‐legislative information disputes may also have implications for the information asymmetries and power dynamics between party leaders and rank‐and‐file members of Congress. Not only can legislative leaders capitalize on knowledge and expertise to shape the legislative process (e.g., Curry 2015; 2019), but the law shapes executive incentives in a way that prioritizes leaders in the oversight process. Legislative leaders have both legal and political sanctioning mechanisms for noncompliance.…”
Section: Legal Developments In the Trump Eramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At its core, information theory asserts that legislative committees expend effort to learn what would happen if a bill were enacted, which leads to a pressure toward ideologically unbiased committees. While information theory often emphasizes the principalagent relationship between legislative parties and committees, committee expertise also shapes interpersonal influence (Curry 2019) with nonexperts taking cues from experts.…”
Section: Professional Background and Information In The Legislative P...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the increasing centralization of staff resources and information in majority party leadership offices has decreased the independent influence of committee chairs over the crafting of much important legislation (Bendix 2016;Curry 2015; but see Curry 2018), chairmen are still instrumental in the production of many bills. data on bill introductions consistently bear this out, Majority Party Strategy and Suspension of the Rules in the House as both full committee and subcommittee chairs introduce considerably more legislation than the average rank-and-file member of the House (volden and Wiseman 2014).…”
Section: Full Committee and Subcommittee Chairsmentioning
confidence: 99%