Proceedings of the 30th European Safety and Reliability Conference and 15th Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conf 2020
DOI: 10.3850/978-981-14-8593-0_5573-cd
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge-Enabled Machine Learning for Predictive Diagnostics: A Case Study for an Automotive Diesel Particulate Filter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This integration adds some flexibility to the modeling process. 150,151 Table 3 compares different knowledge-based methods by summarizing their generic advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This integration adds some flexibility to the modeling process. 150,151 Table 3 compares different knowledge-based methods by summarizing their generic advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, knowledge‐based models are more associated with hybrid approaches rather than independent diagnostics and prognostics techniques in recent years. This integration adds some flexibility to the modeling process 150,151 . Table 3 compares different knowledge‐based methods by summarizing their generic advantages and disadvantages.…”
Section: Diagnostics and Prognostics Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This reflects the partition of predictor variables into "journey parameters" and "driver behaviour". The second category of predictors capture the way in which the vehicle is drivenwhich is dependent on the driver choice or driver specific behaviour, for which a range of trip statistics can be used as data features for the machine learning model (see for example Doikin et al, 2020). The classification accuracy is then evaluated using the confusion matrix, which calculates the number of correctly classified classes versus the total number of attempts.…”
Section: Framework For Driver Behaviour Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even in these cases, the robustness of the current health ICED21 state estimation is affected by sensor fidelity (Tamssaouet et al, 2020), where measurement noise can be caused by electrical interference, digitisation error, sensor bias, dead-band, backlash, and nonlinearity in the response (Saha and Goebel, 2008). In the previous work (Doikin et al, 2020), a knowledge-enabled data-driven framework was presented to increase the trust level to sensor measurements. The challenge presented in this paper focuses on prognostics modelling, which is affected by future uncertainties.…”
Section: Figure 2 Uncertainty Quantification In Prognostics Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%