Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Electronic Commerce - ICEC '05 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1089551.1089673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge elicitation for query refinement in a semantic-enabled e-marketplace

Abstract: In this paper we present a knowledge-based approach to the elicitation of information from advertisements, in the framework of a semantic-enabled marketplace. The elicited information can be used for advertisements enriching and refining, without requiring users thorough knowledge of the domain, and to determine a logicbased exact match. The approach exploits non-standard inference services in Description Logics, namely Abduction and Contraction, to tackle a typical problem of semantic-enabled marketplaces, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides these user-generated constraints, as stated before, the system may also be aware of other constraint that are specific of the knowledge domain such as "if the house has a big garden then it cannot be in the city center ". We basically have two main types of knowledge-based recommender systems: case-based [13] and constraint-based [62,24,19] depending on the approach adopted in the representation and reasoning with user requirements and domain knowledge.…”
Section: Recommendation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides these user-generated constraints, as stated before, the system may also be aware of other constraint that are specific of the knowledge domain such as "if the house has a big garden then it cannot be in the city center ". We basically have two main types of knowledge-based recommender systems: case-based [13] and constraint-based [62,24,19] depending on the approach adopted in the representation and reasoning with user requirements and domain knowledge.…”
Section: Recommendation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If D and S are in potential match, the characteristics B (for bonus) [13] specified in S but not requested in D represent the knowledge that can be elicited and proposed to the requester in order to still refine the initial query. At this point it should be easy to see how B can be computed solving a Concept Abduction problem.…”
Section: Non Standard Inference Services For Logicalmentioning
confidence: 99%