2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13112116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge-Driven GeoAI: Integrating Spatial Knowledge into Multi-Scale Deep Learning for Mars Crater Detection

Abstract: This paper introduces a new GeoAI solution to support automated mapping of global craters on the Mars surface. Traditional crater detection algorithms suffer from the limitation of working only in a semiautomated or multi-stage manner, and most were developed to handle a specific dataset in a small subarea of Mars’ surface, hindering their transferability for global crater detection. As an alternative, we propose a GeoAI solution based on deep learning to tackle this problem effectively. Three innovative featu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other commonly acknowledged concerns include building GeoAI benchmark datasets, robust and explainable models, fusing and processing multi-source geospatial data sets, and enabling knowledge driven GeoAI research [17,437,441,442]. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to ethical issues in GeoAI research.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other commonly acknowledged concerns include building GeoAI benchmark datasets, robust and explainable models, fusing and processing multi-source geospatial data sets, and enabling knowledge driven GeoAI research [17,437,441,442]. In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to ethical issues in GeoAI research.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Research Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing application is able to classify and detect lineament structure from Mars and Moon [17,26]. However, present deep-learning based methods are mainly focusing on crater detection [27][28][29], very few research are related with extraction of lineament structure on the Lunar surface based on deep learning networks due to the lack of such datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019), image processing and pattern techniques have also been applied for terrain analysis, but these algorithms tend to be poorly suited to terrain data, since they are generally not smoothly‐varying (Wang & Li, 2021). Machine learning has been recently introduced for feature detection with great success (e.g., Hsu et al., 2021; Steinfeld et al., 2013; Torres et al., 2020; Wang & Li, 2021; with true positive detection rates of about 60%–98%); data preparation for model training, though, can be time‐consuming and labor‐intensive since training data requires pre‐existing data sets that are generally developed using semi‐automated or fully manual methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%