2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46643-5_32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Distillation for Brain Tumor Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be done automatically to cope with the time-consuming disadvantage of manual segmentation ( 29 , 30 ). Considering that the MRI images in our study were also used in the BraTS challenge and that the ground truth of tumor segmentation for patients in our cohort are not all available, we used the pre-trained model on the BraTS challenge 2019 to delineate the regions of tumor lesions, which achieved the accuracy of 90.45% on the validation set ( 31 ). In the BraTS 2019 dataset, all the samples in the training set are provided with four ground truth labels for 4 regions: background (label 0), necrotic and non-enhanced tumor (label 1), peritumoral edema (label 2), and enhanced tumor (label 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be done automatically to cope with the time-consuming disadvantage of manual segmentation ( 29 , 30 ). Considering that the MRI images in our study were also used in the BraTS challenge and that the ground truth of tumor segmentation for patients in our cohort are not all available, we used the pre-trained model on the BraTS challenge 2019 to delineate the regions of tumor lesions, which achieved the accuracy of 90.45% on the validation set ( 31 ). In the BraTS 2019 dataset, all the samples in the training set are provided with four ground truth labels for 4 regions: background (label 0), necrotic and non-enhanced tumor (label 1), peritumoral edema (label 2), and enhanced tumor (label 4).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[70] introduced brain parcellation atlas to produce a location prior information for tumor segmentation. Lachinov et al [75] ensembles two variant U-Net [59,97] and a cascaded U-Net [76]. The final ensemble result out-performs each single network 1-2%.…”
Section: Network Ensemblementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the adversarial perturbation that we generated is applicable to many semantic segmentation methods, we selected a pretrained model from the work of Lachinov et al [28]. The goal of their research was to combine three U-net style neural networks and compare the performance between the ensemble model trained with the regular quantity of data and one single neural network trained with an additional quantity of data.…”
Section: The Targeted Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%