The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016 6th IEEE International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/biorob.2016.7523711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Discovery strategy over patient performance data towards the extraction of hemiparesis-inherent features: A case study

Abstract: Aiming to perform an extraction of features which are strongly related to hemiparesis, this work describes a case study involving the efforts of patients in upper-limb rehabilitation, diagnosed with such pathology. Expressed as data (kinematic and dynamic measures), patients' performance were sensed and stored by a single InMotion Arm robotic device for further analysis. It was applied a Knowledge Discovery roadmap over collected data in order to preprocess, transform and perform data mining through machine le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously highlighted in Section 2.1.2, both feature selection and extraction techniques are possible to perform over raw data. For the sake of interpretability, regarding feature extraction, in most of the cases it is preferred to keep the underlying semantics from the raw input (MORETTI et al, 2016;DIPIETRO et al, 2012;COLOMBO et al, 2012;JUNG;GLASGOW;SCOTT, 2008) avoiding spatial transformations. However, it is sometimes the case that more than one technique, including spatial transformations (BOSECKER et al, 2010) for dimensionality reduction, is required.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As previously highlighted in Section 2.1.2, both feature selection and extraction techniques are possible to perform over raw data. For the sake of interpretability, regarding feature extraction, in most of the cases it is preferred to keep the underlying semantics from the raw input (MORETTI et al, 2016;DIPIETRO et al, 2012;COLOMBO et al, 2012;JUNG;GLASGOW;SCOTT, 2008) avoiding spatial transformations. However, it is sometimes the case that more than one technique, including spatial transformations (BOSECKER et al, 2010) for dimensionality reduction, is required.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous work (MORETTI et al, 2016), yielding 24 features purely based on descriptive statistics, we calculated the statistical moments of the distribution of kinematic and dynamic measures, such as positions, velocities and forces. Different from Dipietro et al (2012) and Bosecker et al (2010), in which the same device was used, we considered every movement (backwards or towards center) of the star-like pattern, so every feature is a descriptor of the entire cycle of movements composing such pattern.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations