2021
DOI: 10.3390/su13094619
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge Criticality Assessment and Codification Framework for Major Maintenance Activities: A Case Study of Cement Rotary Kiln Plant

Abstract: Maintenance experts involved in managing major maintenance activities such as; Major overhauls, outages, shutdowns and turnarounds (MoOSTs) are constantly faced with uncertainties during the planning and/or execution phases, which often stretches beyond the organisation’s standard operating procedures and require the intervention of staff expertise. This underpins a need to complement and sustain existing efforts in managing uncertainties in MoOSTs through the transformation of knowledgeable actions generated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(67 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, their work was criticized for being limited to a single maintenance team. Hence, further validation is needed to account for scenarios that involve several maintenance teams working in parallel, especially during major overhauls, outages or shutdowns (MoOSTs) [157,158]. McArthur et al [159] proposed a machine-learning algorithm to visualise, predict and classify maintenance work orders.…”
Section: Maintenance Planning Scheduling and Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their work was criticized for being limited to a single maintenance team. Hence, further validation is needed to account for scenarios that involve several maintenance teams working in parallel, especially during major overhauls, outages or shutdowns (MoOSTs) [157,158]. McArthur et al [159] proposed a machine-learning algorithm to visualise, predict and classify maintenance work orders.…”
Section: Maintenance Planning Scheduling and Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, the norm was to assign MoOSTs objectives and criticality in activities critical paths based on project objectives obtained through mathematical analysis, (usually a "forward pass," "backward pass," and "float calculation"). The effect of adopting traditional project-based objectives might limit the examination of critical activities in MoOSTs if the aim is to engender experience-based learning [89]. Furthermore, lack of ownership was identified as a main barrier to learning, because MoOSTs are labor intensive, substantial number of outsourced resources are committed towards each cycle.…”
Section: Data Analysis Of Semi-structured Interview-thematic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the solution string constructed, the number of preventive maintenance action (N) was set to N max and the threshold of reliability. The algorithm was set in such a way that for each N (1:N max ) selected, the maintenance time was evaluated using Equation (6). The total maintenance time takes care of both the planned preventive and corrective maintenance times.…”
Section: Optimization Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique was used to determine the effects of maintenance decisions, as well as their operational implications. Another work by Esotu and Kaltingo [6] proposed a quantitative and qualitative hybrid model that analyzes the criticality assessment values of major overhauls, outages, shutdowns, and turn-arounds (MOOST) activities that effectively benefits from criticality assessment to reduce task uncertainties in a system, either in plants or businesses. To properly increase sustainability and improve reliability, plant disaster and system failure analysis should be ensured [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%