2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge-city index construction: An intellectual capital perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been increasing demands to construct indicators that can assess urban sustainability, and many lists of urban sustainability indicators have been provided [6][7][8][9]. For example, Shen et al examined and compared nine different lists of urban sustainability indicators used for nine regions/cities, and derived a primary list of urban sustainability indicators on a comparative basis [10].…”
Section: Sustainability and The Transdisciplinary Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been increasing demands to construct indicators that can assess urban sustainability, and many lists of urban sustainability indicators have been provided [6][7][8][9]. For example, Shen et al examined and compared nine different lists of urban sustainability indicators used for nine regions/cities, and derived a primary list of urban sustainability indicators on a comparative basis [10].…”
Section: Sustainability and The Transdisciplinary Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The City Intellectual Capital approach assumes that the traditional dimensions of intellectual capital (human, relational, and structural capital) can help leverage knowledge resources and innovation capacity (Schiuma and Lerro ) to address specific threats and opportunities in city systems, where dimensions such as quality of life, level of participation, identity, and vision assume particular relevance. Several authors have proposed city intellectual capital models: 1) city competitiveness (Schiuma and Lerro ); 2) city's intellectual capital framework (Uziene ); 3) knowledge‐based model of cities (López‐Ruiz, Alfaro‐Navarro, and Nevado‐Peña ); and 4) a management‐oriented view of the smart city (Dameri and Ricciardi ).…”
Section: Intelligent and Smart Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many models have been developed to analyze and measure smart city‐related concepts, such as “Smart City Intellectual Capital” (Dameri and Ricciardi ), “City's Knowledge‐Based Capital” (Schiuma and Lerro ), “City's Intellectual Capital Framework” (Uziene ), “Knowledge City Index” (López‐Ruiz, Alfaro‐Navarro, and Nevado‐Peña ), “Happy City Index” (http://www.happycity.org.uk/), “Life‐satisfaction ranking” (Oswald and Wu ), “European Smart City Model” (Giffinger et al ), “Urban Audit” (http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/index.cfm/en/policy/themes/urban-development/audit/), “Business Excellence Attraction Composite Index” (Murillo, Romaní, and Suriñach ), “Global Cities Index” (http://www.foreignpolicy.com), “The Coverage Index” (Neirotti et al ), and “Quality of life and business environment” (Chen and Rosenthal ), among many other models developed by other researchers and international organizations around the world. Whereas all these models vary in depth and breadth, it is well beyond the scope of this particular paper to discuss, compare, assess, sort, or facilitate a choice among alternatives models.…”
Section: Intelligent and Smart Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the market's point of view, a company's global objective is to maintain a position in the market. In a knowledge-based economy, increasing the company's intellectual capital is a primary element of this strategy (López-Ruiz et al, 2014;Nemetz, 2006). Moreover, from the knowledge perspective, the organization's knowledge worker competences and any related core competences are an important part of intellectual capital (Ulrich, 1998).…”
Section: Knowledge Workermentioning
confidence: 99%