Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 1995
DOI: 10.2514/6.1995-3366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge-based scheduling of arrival aircraft in the terminal area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensive simulation and operational assessment of pFAST has shown a high level of schedule acceptance can be achieved by considering all merge locations in the TRACON; an acceptable result was never achieved by only considering the threshold scheduling constraint. 9 While pFAST demonstrated the importance of considering all TRACON merge locations in producing an acceptable schedule, the fidelity to which it modeled American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics these merge locations does not fully support active advisories. Passive FAST modeled the arrival merge locations as static merge points, while they in fact can move within the defined airspace.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive simulation and operational assessment of pFAST has shown a high level of schedule acceptance can be achieved by considering all merge locations in the TRACON; an acceptable result was never achieved by only considering the threshold scheduling constraint. 9 While pFAST demonstrated the importance of considering all TRACON merge locations in producing an acceptable schedule, the fidelity to which it modeled American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics these merge locations does not fully support active advisories. Passive FAST modeled the arrival merge locations as static merge points, while they in fact can move within the defined airspace.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%