Knowledge‐Based Radar Detection, Tracking, and Classification 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9780470283158.ch3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge‐Based Radar Signal and Data Processing: A Tutorial Overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R ww is estimated from available sensor data, or from receiver output signals with the receiver input blocked, or other means. R αα is estimated adaptively using previously-recorded data [20], a priori information [21], structured covariance techniques [22], analytical modeling techniques [23,24], or combinations of these methods. In fact, the methodology proposed here benefits directly from the large number of covariance estimation techniques developed in the adaptive array and space-time adaptive processing (STAP) areas.…”
Section: Waveform Selection Using Mutual Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…R ww is estimated from available sensor data, or from receiver output signals with the receiver input blocked, or other means. R αα is estimated adaptively using previously-recorded data [20], a priori information [21], structured covariance techniques [22], analytical modeling techniques [23,24], or combinations of these methods. In fact, the methodology proposed here benefits directly from the large number of covariance estimation techniques developed in the adaptive array and space-time adaptive processing (STAP) areas.…”
Section: Waveform Selection Using Mutual Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, knowledge-aided space-time adaptive processing (KA-STAP) has received much attention due to its potential of utilizing some available prior knowledge [11]- [14]. One focus of the KA-STAP is how the prior knowledge can be incorporated to formulate the detection problem [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The agent first checks whether its local observations agree with the proposed assessment, say P x (line 2). If the agent agrees with the assessment P x , then it will just forward the message randomly to another agent, increasing ♯agree (lines [3][4][5][6]. If the agent disagrees, status is changed to "CHALLENGE".…”
Section: Distributed Assessment Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capraro et al use symbolic reasoning to refine perceptions at data level [5]: instead of allowing for higher level conclusions, a priori knowledge related to the specific sensor attitude is used to customize and tune the feature extraction process, thus reducing the effects of the uncertainty of information sources. With respect to these approaches, our research will pursue the goal of giving high level events a unique symbolic representation, and obtaining new conclusions with logical reasoning, distributing the process over a team of agents.…”
Section: Centralized Situation Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation