2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2012.6288831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge-based Quadratic Discriminant Analysis for phonetic classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of second-order polynomial features improves the performance of phone classification [1], and automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems [2,3]. Higher-order polynomial features [4,5], as a natural extension to the second-order polynomial features, might convey discriminative information which adds to the first-/second-order polynomial features and might improve ASR performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of second-order polynomial features improves the performance of phone classification [1], and automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems [2,3]. Higher-order polynomial features [4,5], as a natural extension to the second-order polynomial features, might convey discriminative information which adds to the first-/second-order polynomial features and might improve ASR performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, their preliminary analyses suggest that RF and methods similar in nature to RF may be more useful than other methods to classify samples based on MS data. Compared to Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis (QDA) methods (Huang et al, 2012), RF has the advantage of not requiring the number of variables used to be less than the number of subjects in the study, which is a clear advantage for the analysis of MS data as the number of m/z versus intensity data points is very large. In addition, RF is able to handle interactions among variables.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%