2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0098-1354(01)00661-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge based models for the analysis of complex separation processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following this approach is remarkable the work by Shah and Kokossis [78,79]. In order to deal with thermal couples they introduce the concept of "supertask".…”
Section: Milp Model In Thermally Coupled Distillation Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this approach is remarkable the work by Shah and Kokossis [78,79]. In order to deal with thermal couples they introduce the concept of "supertask".…”
Section: Milp Model In Thermally Coupled Distillation Sequencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge-driven modelling approaches [122] For separation method/solvent/resources combinations that are complicated to model due to a lack of information, a data driven approach can be taken in developing a rigorous model that can be used in this task…”
Section: Detailed Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first test problem is widely used by other researchers (Malone et al, 1985;Gadkari and Govind, 1988;Glinos and Malone, 1989;Porter and Momoh, 1991;Floquet et al, 1994;Jobson, 1997;Rong et al, 2001;Shah and Kokossis, 2001). Table 3.…”
Section: Example 1: a Typical Five-component Mixturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This well-known problem, often, is defined as: "Given a feed stream of known conditions (i.e., composition, flow-rate, temperature and pressure), what is the best process that separates the desired products from the feed at minimum Total Annual Cost." In order to solve this problem, various approaches and methods have been presented (Stephanopoulos and Westerberg, 1976;Tedder and Rudd, 1978;Porter and Momoh, 1991;Floquet et al, 1994;Garrard and Fraga, 1998;Shah and Kokossis, 2001). Nishida et al (1981) have classified these methods into the following three main categories: Heuristic methods have provided a very simple basis for an easy and quick analysis, in that these methods have the advantage of speed and minimal data requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%