1996
DOI: 10.1006/cviu.1996.0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge-Based Interpretation of Utility Maps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The map interpretation system of den Hartog et al [15] also appears very similar to ANON. It employs an object-oriented, semantic net representation of drawing entities and their interrelationships and is based around a three-component, cyclic control structure.…”
Section: Comparing Structured Systems At the Knowledge Levelmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The map interpretation system of den Hartog et al [15] also appears very similar to ANON. It employs an object-oriented, semantic net representation of drawing entities and their interrelationships and is based around a three-component, cyclic control structure.…”
Section: Comparing Structured Systems At the Knowledge Levelmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Two drawing interpretation systems which comprise similar components communicating in similar ways are the mechanical drawing interpretation system of Joseph and Pridmore [13] and the utility map interpretation system of den Hartog, ten Kate and Gerbrands [15].…”
Section: Comparing Structured Systems At the Knowledge Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original positional error of analogue geographic information is incremented during the digitalisation process that consists of a preliminary scanning of paper sheets, followed by a feature extraction step. Different errors are introduced when a manual (Bolstad et al 1990) or an automatic process is used (Den Hartog et al 1996). Subsequently, some editing tasks like line simplification (Douglas and Peucker 1973;Vereign 2000) and generalisation (Blakemore 1984;João 1995) might introduce errors that must be considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially true for those approaches (e.g., Neural Network based approaches [1]) that require large sets of pattern samples for pre-training. Similarly, the syntaxes and structures of the patterns should also be pre-defined before recognition in syntactic and structural approaches (e.g., [2]) and the knowledge about the patterns should also be pre-acquired before recognition in knowledge-based approaches (e.g., [2] and [8]). For example, if the task is to recognize lines from images, the attributes or features of the line patterns should be analyzed such that appropriate representations and algorithm can be designed and implemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usually, the features, syntaxes, and other knowledge about the patterns, e.g., the graphic geometry, are hard-coded in the recognition algorithms. Hence, currently, each graphics recognition algorithm only deals with a limited set of specific, known graphic patterns, e.g., dimension-sets [2], shafts [8]. Once implemented and incorporated in a graphics recognition system, these features, syntaxes, and knowledge cannot be changed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%