2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijass.2010.038350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge-based approaches in strategic management: a review of the literature

Abstract: Although Knowledge Management (KM) has been acknowledged as the most important resource and capability of an organisation, many academics' standpoints argue upon knowledge distinct characteristics. This paper is a critical review of KM literature and attempts to clarify different knowledge perspectives and offer a holistic picture of one of the most controversial issues to management science. We, first, build our critique on knowledge theory, explaining what knowledge is. Regarding different knowledge perspect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paradigm proposes, above all, the reorganization of resources, information filtering, horizontal collaboration with other partners in common processes, rapid knowledge absorption, and maximum learning power (Lichtenthaler, 2009;Kostopoulos et al, 2010;Chesbrough 2003;Cohen & Levithal, 1990). Despite increasing interest in open innovation, many authors criticize the absence of research into its application by firms (Lee et al, 2010;Steen & Vanhaverbeke, 2016;Del Río, Peñasco & RomeroJordán, 2016;Bossle et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paradigm proposes, above all, the reorganization of resources, information filtering, horizontal collaboration with other partners in common processes, rapid knowledge absorption, and maximum learning power (Lichtenthaler, 2009;Kostopoulos et al, 2010;Chesbrough 2003;Cohen & Levithal, 1990). Despite increasing interest in open innovation, many authors criticize the absence of research into its application by firms (Lee et al, 2010;Steen & Vanhaverbeke, 2016;Del Río, Peñasco & RomeroJordán, 2016;Bossle et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%