1990
DOI: 10.1016/0885-2014(90)90028-r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge base influences on judgments of frequency of occurrence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking at the effect of familiarity on nonverbal stimuli provides a different picture from that of verbal stimuli. Harris, Durso, Mergler, and Jones (1990) found that children and young adults judged the frequency of occurrence of familiar faces more accurately than unknown faces. Despite the difficulties noted earlier with regard to using faces as nonverbal stimuli, these findings suggest that novelty, or degree of familiarity, may be an important variable when judging the frequency of occurrence of nonverbal stimuli; in fact, the effect of familiarity is the reverse of that found with verbal stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Looking at the effect of familiarity on nonverbal stimuli provides a different picture from that of verbal stimuli. Harris, Durso, Mergler, and Jones (1990) found that children and young adults judged the frequency of occurrence of familiar faces more accurately than unknown faces. Despite the difficulties noted earlier with regard to using faces as nonverbal stimuli, these findings suggest that novelty, or degree of familiarity, may be an important variable when judging the frequency of occurrence of nonverbal stimuli; in fact, the effect of familiarity is the reverse of that found with verbal stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…22 Children provide especially biased responses to discrete (e.g., yes/no) questions 23-26 and have been shown to have difficulty making frequency judgments as required by the Child-SCAT3. 27,28 Consequently, it is considered best practice when interviewing young children to maximize the use of open-ended questions and engage in pre-interview “ground rules” discussions to allow children to practice saying “I don't know” and asking for clarification. 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, following the premise that one bases frequency estimates on domain‐specific knowledge (i.e. the people one knows; Harris et al , 1990), if one associates with friends who tend to be inclusive of other‐race members (i.e. other high‐contact students), then one is likely to observe such inclusiveness and generalize it to one's peers as a whole when making frequency estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, children with higher intergroup contact are likely to know and associate with high‐contact children, and children with lower intergroup contact are likely to know and associate with low‐contact children. Moreover, studies such as that by Harris, Durso, Mergler, and Jones (1990) found that frequency estimations are based on domain‐specific knowledge of stimuli, that is, on people one knows rather than on people one does not know. In view of these findings, we predicted that students with higher levels of intergroup contact would give relatively lower estimations of race‐based exclusion, while those with lower levels of intergroup contact would give relatively higher estimations of such exclusion among their friends and acquaintances.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%