2018
DOI: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_27_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among gynecologists regarding oral health of expectant mothers and infants in Bhubaneswar City, Odisha

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning their attitudes, 19,23,24,29,31–34,40 gynecologists and obstetricians presented an adequate attitude in 60.0% of the studies (6 out of 10 studies; Table S1), 19,23–25,28,32–34,37,38 contrasting with midwives (43.0%; 3 out of 7 studies; Table S3), 26,30,31,34,35,40,42 general physicians (0.0%; 0 out of 2 studies; Table S2), 25,26 and nurses (0.0%; 0 out of 4 studies; Table S4). 21,26,35,42 Regarding practices, these were only adequate in 25.0% of the studies evaluating gynecologists and obstetricians (2 out of 8 studies; Table S1), 19,24,25,28,32–34,37 17.0% of the studies evaluating midwives (1 out of 6 studies; Table S3), 26,30,31,34–36,39,40,42 33.0% of studies evaluating general practitioners (1 out of 3 studies; Table S2), 25,26,29 and 0.0% of the studies evaluating nurses (0 of 4 studies; Table S4). 21,26,35,42 Although the majority of PCP acknowledged the importance of oral health care during pregnancy, most professionals did not interview pregnant women on their oral health status and the reasons presented were lack of oral health training, the subject not being a priority, or because asking about oral health care was considered outside the scope and responsibility of PCP 21,29,38,42 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning their attitudes, 19,23,24,29,31–34,40 gynecologists and obstetricians presented an adequate attitude in 60.0% of the studies (6 out of 10 studies; Table S1), 19,23–25,28,32–34,37,38 contrasting with midwives (43.0%; 3 out of 7 studies; Table S3), 26,30,31,34,35,40,42 general physicians (0.0%; 0 out of 2 studies; Table S2), 25,26 and nurses (0.0%; 0 out of 4 studies; Table S4). 21,26,35,42 Regarding practices, these were only adequate in 25.0% of the studies evaluating gynecologists and obstetricians (2 out of 8 studies; Table S1), 19,24,25,28,32–34,37 17.0% of the studies evaluating midwives (1 out of 6 studies; Table S3), 26,30,31,34–36,39,40,42 33.0% of studies evaluating general practitioners (1 out of 3 studies; Table S2), 25,26,29 and 0.0% of the studies evaluating nurses (0 of 4 studies; Table S4). 21,26,35,42 Although the majority of PCP acknowledged the importance of oral health care during pregnancy, most professionals did not interview pregnant women on their oral health status and the reasons presented were lack of oral health training, the subject not being a priority, or because asking about oral health care was considered outside the scope and responsibility of PCP 21,29,38,42 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In each of the included studies, the study population was mostly gynecologists/obstetricians ( n = 16), 19,20,22–25,27,28,32–34,36–39,41 but there were also studies including and/or focused on midwives ( n = 9), 26,30,31,34–36,39,40,42 general or family physicians/practitioners ( n = 5), 25,26,29,36,39 and nurses ( n = 4) 21,26,35,42 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations