2020
DOI: 10.1080/15378020.2020.1859972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) of foodservice providers, and microbial quality on food served in Kumasi

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, food service employees should be trained to have the knowledge needed in undertaking their tasks and to attain skills improving their practices of food handling. So, knowledge, attitude and practice of food handlers, play dominant role in food safety with regards to food service safety (30) Concerning the food handlers" knowledge regarding food safety and proper food temperature control, the results of the present study showed that more than one quarter of the food handlers had poor knowledge regarding food safety and less than one fifth of them had good knowledge level. This could be explained by the educational level of the food handlers where more than half of them were from basic and secondary education, which may affect them knowledge level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In other words, food service employees should be trained to have the knowledge needed in undertaking their tasks and to attain skills improving their practices of food handling. So, knowledge, attitude and practice of food handlers, play dominant role in food safety with regards to food service safety (30) Concerning the food handlers" knowledge regarding food safety and proper food temperature control, the results of the present study showed that more than one quarter of the food handlers had poor knowledge regarding food safety and less than one fifth of them had good knowledge level. This could be explained by the educational level of the food handlers where more than half of them were from basic and secondary education, which may affect them knowledge level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Regarding the quality of the included studies, eight studies 4 , 6 , 11 , 20 , 22 , 26 , 34 , 40 had a low risk of bias (24.2%), and 25 studies 2 , 7 , 12 , 16 19 , 21 , 23 – 25 , 27 33 , 35 – 39 , 41 , 42 had a moderate risk of bias (75.8%) (Supplementary File Table 3 , on pages 2 and 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%