2016
DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1106_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Knowledge, attitude & practice on human papillomavirus vaccination: A cross-sectional study among healthcare providers

Abstract: Background & objectives:Cervical cancer is a major health problem and a leading cause of death among women in India. Of all the associated risk factors, high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infections being the principal aetiologic agent, two HPV vaccines are in use for the control of cervical cancer. The present study was undertaken to explore the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) on HPV vaccination among the healthcare providers in India.Methods:A cross-sectional study was conducted among 590 healthcare… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Present study result is consistent with other studies in India that showed low level of cervical cancer and HPV knowledge even in medical students Mehta S et al 19 Also there is lack of knowledge in paramedical staff workers in India as shown in a study by Chawla PC et al, who found that only 47 % of respondents recommended HPV vaccine. 20 Similarly, another study among college students aged 18-35 years in Ghana, done by Molowku PN et al, noted very low awareness (7.9%) regarding the link between HPV and cervical cancer. 21 The poor knowledge of HPV infection may result in reduced perceived risk and severity of HPV infection, thereby accounting for the low acceptability rate of HPV vaccination in present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Present study result is consistent with other studies in India that showed low level of cervical cancer and HPV knowledge even in medical students Mehta S et al 19 Also there is lack of knowledge in paramedical staff workers in India as shown in a study by Chawla PC et al, who found that only 47 % of respondents recommended HPV vaccine. 20 Similarly, another study among college students aged 18-35 years in Ghana, done by Molowku PN et al, noted very low awareness (7.9%) regarding the link between HPV and cervical cancer. 21 The poor knowledge of HPV infection may result in reduced perceived risk and severity of HPV infection, thereby accounting for the low acceptability rate of HPV vaccination in present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In our study, protection against cervical cancer and genital warts were the most frequently cited advantages of HPV vaccination, consistent with literature from Malaysia, where over 95% of providers agreed that HPV vaccines can prevent cervical cancer, 14 and in India, where 81% of surveyed health care professionals were aware that vaccination prevents cervical cancer. 19 Concern about cost was the most frequently cited disadvantage of HPV vaccination among providers within each country. Similarly, cost was the most important consideration in willingness to vaccinate among health care providers in Vietnam, which does not have a routine HPV immunization program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet quantitative global data on provider vaccination practices are relatively scarce. 18 Studies on providers' HPV vaccination recommendation practices in individual countries exist, 14,19 including studies among health providers in Europe, which identify concerns about the vaccine's efficacy and long-term effects, provider's lack of time, and difficulty providing information to the target population of girls. 20, 21 However, none have described health provider responses across countries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by Chawla et al among healthcare providers 70% knew about the oncogenic strains. 12 The studies done on medical students did not have a question on the oncogenic strains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%